2. 考研
  3. 　　Insects are disappearing. The world has 25 percent fewer terrestrial insects now than in 1990. This includes those we rely on

　　Insects are disappearing. The world has 25 percent fewer terrestrial insects now than in 1990. This includes those we rely on

admin2022-02-15  36
问题 　　Insects are disappearing. The world has 25 percent fewer terrestrial insects now than in 1990. This includes those we rely on to pollinate our crops and clean our rivers. If we don’t solve this problem very soon, some species will disappear. There are many causes for the insect decline, but insecticides are a major part of the problem. Those used today are longer lasting and up to 10,000 times more toxic than some that were banned in the 1970s.【C1】_______________________.
　　Overall, the amount of pesticide applied to the land is decreasing, but this is a grossly misleading statistic. A recent paper found that, between 2005 and 2015, there was a 40 per cent
　　reduction in the  amount of pesticide applied to crops measured by weight.【C2】_______________________. Governments and regulating agencies are aware of the problem, and some parts of the world have moved to ban the use of certain insecticides outdoors in an attempt to help bees survive. But the pesticides used instead are just as toxic.
　　One often-touted approach is to use pesticide-free pest control methods. These varied techniques are gathered under the name of integrated pest management (IPM) and have been around for decades. They offer effective crop protection and include methods such as crop rotation and the use of natural predators. But their adoption has been incredibly slow, because spraying pesticides is viewed as an easier option. As a result, IPM methods are unfortunately seldom used today.【C3】_______________________. We argue instead that we need a subtle shift in focus, away from killing pests and towards protecting crops.
　　Currently, products are developed and marketed to kill pest insects immediately. But the real goal of pesticide use isn’t to wipe out insects, it is just to protect crops to secure food production. We have found that using just a fraction of the concentrations applied today stops insects feeding on crops.
　　【C4】_______________________. This low dose is the equivalent of an antimosquito spray: it repels mosquitoes so they don’t bite you. Whether the mosquito is alive or not doesn’t matter, either way you have received protection.
　　【C5】_______________________. Farmers know that a handful of insects don’t cause problems, it is when they reproduce that trouble comes. We have found that much less insecticide is needed to prevent insects from reproducing than is needed to kill them.
　　By using the minimal dose we need to protect crops, we could reduce the amount of insecticide to a fraction of what is used today. Farmers would benefit from these changes. They would spend less money on pesticides and improve crop production by keeping healthy pollinator insects about. Reducing insecticide doses won’t solve the insect decline problem, but it is a move that could win us time to make food production more sustainable and reconcile farmlands and the natural ecosystems we crucially depend on.
[A] This has become the goal of crop treatments, and the death of the insect is considered the proof that a treatment works.
[B] Similarly, we don’t need to kill all pest insects in a crop: we just need to reduce the population enough to ensure that it causes no important economic damage.
[C] Adding to the problem is that these pesticides are now applied to crops prophylactically and used whether pests are present or not.
[D] But because modern insecticides are so much more toxic, the global toxicity of treated land to pollinating insects has more than doubled in the same period.
[E] At these reduced concentrations, there would be a lot less insecticide leaching into the environment, so less harm to beneficial insects.
[F] Often, they are first treated with fungicides that also happen to be toxic to insects and then treated again with an insecticide which is like killing one bird with two stones.
[G] Neither changing insecticides nor shifting to IPM is a quick fix.
【C3】
选项
答案[G]
解析 由本段首句One often-touted approach is to use pesticide-free pest control methods“一种经常被吹捧的方法是使用无杀虫剂的害虫控制方法”可知，此段讨论解决问题的方法。本题之前提到方法之一为IPM，该名词在选项[G]中复现。另外也提到But their adoption has been incredibly slow“但它们的应用非常缓慢”，由此可知IPM并不是解决问题的根本方法。符合该含义的只有选项[G]Neither changing insecticides nor shifting to IPM is a quick fix“改变杀虫剂或改用综合虫害管理都不是一个快速解决的办法”。因此作者在本题之后提出了最终解决之法：“We argue instead that we need a subtle shift in focus，away from kiHing pests and towards protecting crops”“相反，我们认为我们需要稍微转移重点，从消灭害虫转向保护农作物”。故本题选择选项[G]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Irg7FFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)