首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
admin
2016-04-26
59
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
A)A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity. B)Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated(复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
C)Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
D)One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied(小众的)pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m -7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish(消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification(the replication of other people’s results)does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
E)Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct, And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such lake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
F)Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis(假设)are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
G)The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
H)All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing(基因组测序)into a flow of truly significant ones.
I)Ideally, research protocols(草案)should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are.(It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.)
Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
J)The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set- aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
K)Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Some clinical trials from 2000 to 2010 were later abandoned by reason of mistakes or impropemess.
选项
答案
B
解析
本题涉及目前学术问题的危害,由clinical trials from 2000 to 2010和mistakes or improper-ness可以定位到B段最后一句。原文提到2000年到2010年间一些临床试验因为试验所依据的研究存在错误或者不当之处而被撤销,题中by reason of对应原文because of,本题是对B段最后一句的同义转述,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/HouFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Lookingforanewweightlossplan?Trylivingontopofamountain.Mountainaircontainslessoxygenthanairatloweraltitud
Astheearth’ssurfaceswarm,evaporation(蒸发)isdryingoutforestsandsoils,increasingsusceptibilitytofire.Lastsummer,m
Sometimeago,aninterestingdiscoverywasmadeby【C1】______ontheAegeanislandofKea.AnAmericanteamexploredatemplewhi
Yearsago,doctorsoftensaidthatpainwasanormalpartoflife.Inparticular,whenolderpatients【C1】______ofpain,theywer
Faces,likefingerprints,areunique.Didyoueverwonderhowitispossibleforustorecognizepeople?Evenaskilledwriterp
TheuseofdeferentiallanguageissymbolicoftheConfucianidealofthewoman,whichdominatesconservativegendernormsinJa
Haveyoueverthoughtaboutwhatdeterminesthewaywearewhenwegrowup?RemembertheTVprogramSevenUp?Itstartedfollowi
Haveyoueverthoughtaboutwhatdeterminesthewaywearewhenwegrowup?RemembertheTVprogramSevenUp?Itstartedfollowi
A、Tomeasurethemovementofwavesintheocean.B、TodeterminewhethertheEarth’stemperatureisgoingup.C、Tostudythebeha
A、Infamilylife.B、Ineducationdepartments.C、Insocialcontribution.D、Inbusinessworld.A细节题。短文提到,社会中男女角色发生了很多变化,而最重要的变化发生在
随机试题
三元组表中的每个节点对应与稀疏矩阵的一个非零元素,它包含有三个数据项,分别表示该元素的______、________和值。
小便不通或点滴不爽,排出无力,面色咣白,神气怯弱,腰膝冷而酸,舌淡,苔白,脉沉细,属何病证
胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的治疗应予中、老年轻、中度2型糖尿病的治疗应予
女,28岁。近4个月来全口牙龈逐渐肿大,刷牙时牙龈易出血,偶有牙龈自动出血史。若患者未妊娠,怀疑为白血病在口腔的表现,确诊的方法为
李某系私营企业振兴服装厂的厂长。李某因与他人发生经济纠纷而被当地西城区公安分局刑事拘留。后经西城区人民检察院批准将其逮捕,数日后区检察院提出公诉。市人民检察院对此判决提出抗诉。在市中级人民法院审理此案期间,市人民检察院撤销了抗诉决定。后市中级人民法院裁定终
股份有限公司的设立及股票的公开发行,都需要经( )批准。
A公司有关股权投资业务如下:(1)2014年1月1日,A公司以银行存款3000万元和一项可供出售金融资产作为对价支付给B公司原股东,取得B公司60%的股权,A公司与B公司的原股东在A公司投资前无关联方关系。A公司作为对价的可供出售金融资产的账面价值为
电动车:行驶:马路
在一个纸盒中有3只红色灯泡和7只绿色灯泡,这些灯泡除了颜色不同之外其他均相同。现在需要用一只绿色灯泡,电工师傅每次从中任取一只灯泡并且不放回,那么他直到第3次才取得绿色灯泡的概率为()。
(2015年真题)下列选项中,不符合宪法发展的世界性趋势的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)