首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
At 9:00 in the evening on January 29, just as President George W. Bush was about to begin his first State of the Union address,
At 9:00 in the evening on January 29, just as President George W. Bush was about to begin his first State of the Union address,
admin
2015-01-26
13
问题
At 9:00 in the evening on January 29, just as President George W. Bush was about to begin his first State of the Union address, I gathered with three anxious scientists in a small, windowless laboratory in Worcester, Massachusetts. We were at Advanced Cell Technology — a privately owned biotechnology company that briefly made international headlines last fall by publishing the first scientific account of cloned human embryos. The significance of the achievement was debatable: the company’s most successful embryo had reached only six cells before it stopped dividing(one other had reached four cells, another had reached two)— a fact that led to a widespread dismissal, in the media and the scientific community, of ACT’s "breakthrough". The work was largely judged to be preliminary, inconsequential, and certainly not worthy of headlines. Many people in political and religious circles, however, had a decidedly different view. They deemed ACT’s work an ethical transgression of the highest order and professed shock, indignation, and horror.
Nonetheless, ACT was pressing ahead—which was why I had come to the company’s cloning lab that night in January. The door to the lab was locked; a surveillance camera mounted on the ceiling watched our every move; and the mood was at once urgent and tense. A human egg, retrieved just hours earlier from a young donor, was positioned under a microscope, its image glowing on a nearby video monitor. The egg’s chromosomes would shortly be removed, and the scientists in the room would attempt to fuse what remained of the egg with a human skin cell. If the procedure succeeded, the result would be a cloned human embryo.
Skin cell to embryo — it’s one of the most remarkable quick-change scenarios modern biology has to offer. It’s also one of the most controversial. Since the announcement, in 1997, of the cloning of the sheep Dolly, attempts to use human cells for cloning have provoked heated debate in the United States, separating those who have faith in the promise of the new technology from those who envision its dark side and unintended consequences.
Crucial to the debate is the fact that human cloning research falls into two distinct categories: reproductive cloning, a widely frowned-on effort that aims to produce a fully formed child; and therapeutic cloning, a scientifically reputable procedure that takes place entirely at the microscopic level and is designed to advance medical therapies and cure human ailments. The two start out the same way— with a new embryo in a Petri dish. But the scientists I was observing in the lab had no intention of creating a person. Instead they were embarking on an experiment that, if successful, would be a first step toward creating radical new cures for patients like the donor of the skin cell — Trevor Ross(not his real name), a two-year-old boy afflicted with a rare and devastating genetic disease.
The mood in the lab was tense in part because of the uncertain outcome of the experiment. But it was also tense because of concern over what President Bush might say about cloning in his address to the nation. A radio in one corner of the room was tuned to the broadcast as the scientists began their work, and they were listening carefully: in perhaps no other fields of science are researchers as mindful of which way the political winds are blowing. The ACT scientists had good reason to be concerned—what they were doing that night might soon be made illegal.
The mood of the ACT’s scientists was tense because______.
选项
A、what they were doing that night might soon be made illegal
B、they would soon make ACT’s breakthroughs
C、they would make international headline that night
D、President George W. Bush might come to their lab that night
答案
A
解析
根据第五段,ACT实验室的科学家们心情紧张的原因是担心布什总统那天晚上向全国所做的电视讲话将决定克隆人研究的合法性。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/HHxDFFFM
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
A、Inthemorning.B、Intheafternoon.C、Intheevening.D、Atnight.A录音中男士讲到自己经常早上去上班的时候头痛。
Youfeelgenerallydepressedandunabletoconcentrate.Your【C1】______ofdailyactivitymaychange;youfindyourself【C2】______a
Youfeelgenerallydepressedandunabletoconcentrate.Your【C1】______ofdailyactivitymaychange;youfindyourself【C2】______a
Itwouldbewildlyoptimistictobelievethattheseadvancesoffsetsuchalargereductioninfarmland.
Convincingthepublictofollowhealthadvicecanbetoughandtime-consuming.Thismaybewhychangestohealthmessagesareof
Twoequallybrilliantscientistsapplyforaprestigiousresearchfellowshipawardedbyatopscientificorganization.Oneiswh
PeoplefromaroundtheworldflocktotheUnitedStatesexpectingtofindabetterlife.Buttoscientists’surprise,agrowing
ThescientistsattheUniversityofBerninSwitzerlandhaveusedaweakenedvirusthatisnotinfectiousandhasprovedsafean
A、AnX-raycamera.B、Amoviecamera.C、Photographer’scamera.D、Atelevisioncamera.D通过“infrontofmillionsofviewers”可知此处的摄
A、Hedoesn’tlikewearingone.B、Hedoesn’tfeelprofessionalwearingone.C、Hedoesn’twearoneinhisdepartment.D、Hedoesn’t
随机试题
某县血站在采血前没有做健康检查,将患有乙型肝炎病原携带者的血液采集混入血库,使用于临床后,造成2人由于输血患了乙型肝炎,对这起事故直接负责的主管人员应做如何处理
A、狼疮性肾炎B、紫癜性肾炎C、乙肝相关性肾炎D、血栓性血小板减少性紫癜E、慢性肾小球肾炎女性,25岁。间断关节痛、双下肢出咀点3个月。化验:血常规WBC3×109/L,HB100g/L,Plt98×109/L;尿常规蛋白(
关于刑法中法条竞合关系的表述,错误的是()。
原始社会规范之所以不能称为“法”,下列对于原因的阐述正确的有()。
固定型铅酸蓄电池循环寿命约()。
某史料记载:“上既削平诸国(女真各部),每三百人设一牛录额真,五牛录设一甲喇额真,五甲喇设一固山额真。”“上”指的是()。
海龟张抗抗D有一个可爱的3岁女儿,对女儿一向有求必应。他的工作单位离家近两小时路程,为了减少往返,他总在周末才回家。每次回家,女儿在晚上临睡前必要让他讲个故事。一年过去,什么
根据以下资料。回答问题。2015年7月,全国共销售彩票270.47亿元,比上年同期(简称“同比”)下降27.3%。其中,福利彩票机构销售155.77亿元,下降10.69/6;体育彩票机构销售114.70亿元,同比减少83.07亿元。2015年1月至7月
除了吃川菜,张涛不吃其他菜肴。所有林村人都爱吃川菜。川菜的特色为麻辣香,其中有大量的干鲜辣椒、花椒、大蒜、姜、葱、香菜等调料。大部分吃川菜的人都喜好一边吃川菜,一边喝四川特有的盖碗茶。如果上述断定为真,则以下哪项一定为真?()
在数据库管理技术的发展中,数据独立性最高的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)