首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
admin
2015-04-24
18
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other — hurl insults, even — and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it. It seems that our society favors a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims. The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong.
Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly consensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even. The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics — just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time — keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves — by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate; if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery — so cruel when practiced on the innocent — can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is to so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel quality if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I ’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
The author thinks that harsh words are appropriate in the following situations EXCEPT
选项
A、when you see something unfair
B、when you are annoyed at someone’s extremely foolish behavior
C、when you are enough with an arrogant person
D、when you are in disagreement with your colleagues
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。根据关键词harsh words定位到原文第五段第二句中的冒号后和尾句,这两处表明了在witness injustice,feel passionately about another’s folly和bring down a tyrant than to mock himmercilessly情况下可以使用harsh words,对照选项,只有选项D不属于其中的情况。故答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/GdJYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Theoldcoupledecidedto______aboyandagirlthoughtheyhadthreechildrenoftheirown.
SomeauthoritiestracethejurysystemtoAnglo-Saxonorevenmore______Germanictimes.
Americanwomenexperienceagreat【1】oflifestyles.A"typical"Americanwomanmaybesingle.Shemayalsobedivorcedormarried
Americanwomenexperienceagreat【1】oflifestyles.A"typical"Americanwomanmaybesingle.Shemayalsobedivorcedormarried
AlongandpainfulstrugglewithcancerandchemotherapyhadcausedbaldnessforBarbaraBasset,ofMocrstown,NJ.Thedayherb
Mostpeoplewouldbe【71】bythehighqualityofmedicine【72】tomostAmericans.Thereisalotofspecialization,agreatdealof【
TheremnantsofRomanEmpirecanbefoundinmanycountriesinAsia,Europe,andAfrica.
Theideaofhumanoidrobotsisnotnew.TheyhavebeenpartoftheimaginativelandscapeeversinceKarlCapek,aCzechwriter,
Whenbotheredbyotheranimalsorhumans,somespeciesofhornedlizardswillposturethreateninglyandsquirtbloodfromtheir
ThemoodofcomplacencyintheEuropeanUnion(EU)isdrivenlargelybytherecoveryinFranceandGermanyandtheimminentlaun
随机试题
叩诊腹大而胀的患者,叩之如鼓者为
A.人参、当归、川芎、白芍、桂心、莪术、丹皮、牛膝、甘草B.人参、当归、熟地黄、杜仲、山药、山茱萸、枸杞子、炙甘草C.桂枝、吴茱萸、当归、芍药、川芎、人参、生姜、麦门冬、半夏、牡丹皮、阿胶、甘草D.当归、熟地黄、白芍、丹皮、茯苓、沙参、黑芥穗E.当
下列关于中水水源的叙述中正确的是()。
丙公司发行5年期公司债券800万元,票面年利率为6%,筹资费用率为1%。若该公司适用企业所得税税率为25%,则发行该批债券的资金成本率为()。
现金清收准备主要包括()。
上年度没有经常项目外汇收入的境内机构新开立经常项目外汇账户时,初始限额原则上不超过等值()。
我国少数民族满族、回族、黎族的主要分布省区依次是()。
党的基本路线的核心是“一个中心、两个基本点”。()
Empiricalevidenceisevidencethatonecansee,hear,touch,taste,orsmell;itisevidencethatissusceptibletoone’ssense
有下面程序代码:PrivateSubCommand1_Click()Dima,sAsIntegera=Array(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9)k=1s=0D
最新回复
(
0
)