首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Help to Buy should be dubbed Help to Vote. George Osborne today promised his party to deliver half a million "hard-working" elec
Help to Buy should be dubbed Help to Vote. George Osborne today promised his party to deliver half a million "hard-working" elec
admin
2015-01-10
18
问题
Help to Buy should be dubbed Help to Vote. George Osborne today promised his party to deliver half a million "hard-working" electors from the dungeons of housing debt to the sunny uplands of Help to Buy. He would shower them with £l2 billion of other people’s money. He could summon the spirits of Toryism past, but will they come? With house prices heading back to their 2009 peak, throwing subsidies at the soft underbelly of housing demand looks crazy. The IMF, the Commons Treasury committee, and every economic commentator thinks the policy is mad. Business investment is still a third below its pre-recession level. Why spend billions on the sector that seems not to need it?
To be fair to Osborne, he dreamed up this scheme two years ago in a search to "kick-start" demand. House-building is an economic talisman that had all but stalled. The first round of Help to Buy last year appeared to work, with new building up by 10%. Nor is there a sign of a house price surge outside the south-east. This year’s rise is 3. 3%, and that is driven partly by a tidal wave of foreign funk money pouring into inner London.
Osborne’s officials are also doing their best to discipline the offer. The subsidized 15% deposit on a mortgage is relatively expensive, and is just for seven years. Banks are being told to subject applicants to tough means and credit tests. For an average house, the scheme is unlikely to be affordable to those with incomes below £30,000 a year.
The Treasury is also charging banks a fee to administer the loans, making it a relatively safe deal for the taxpayer. In other words, this is no Fannie Mae. It is not about dousing the incautious poor with houses, rather helping our old friends the middling rich. Of the half million people whose dreams David Cameron promises to "make come true", Savills estate agency group reckons a third will be existing home-owners trading up. In other words, if Osborne must stand on the street corner handing money to people, I would certainly rather it went to a few hard-pressed households ready to channel it into the real economy, and it went to them than to the other favourite recipients of his billions.
For all that, the Help to Buy scheme vividly demonstrates the madcap world of British housing finance. The privately owned home has sat at the heart of political argument since the days of Margaret Thatcher. She considered home ownership a right. "Getting on the ladder" was a ritual of growing up. Rent, paid by most Europeans for somewhere to live, was "money down the drain". Thatcher subsidized ownership to the hilt with mortgage tax relief, ignoring the fact that most mortgage-holders were in effect renting their homes from building societies. The accrued value usually lay inert until retirement, or until it passed to lucky offspring. Housing subsidies are either pension subsidies or a colossal child benefit for the next generation rich.
Britons have come to expect politicians to help them step on to the ladder in their late 20s and early 30s. Germans, French and Japanese wait into their 40s, letting their savings fructify in the industrial economy. This is reflected in the figures. Home ownership comprises 43% of households in Germany and 70% in Britain. Just 17% of Britons rent privately, against 48% of Germans. This is some "Englishman’s castle", merely the direct result of half a century of political bribery.
As the economist Adam Posen has pointed out: subsidizing home ownership is not just "a bias towards inflation and housing bubbles", it leaves less money to help those in real housing need. It distorts the nation’s capital accumulation towards bricks and mortar. It increases the divide between house inheritors and the poor. Because home ownership is the icon of the centre ground, Labour panders to it as much as the Tories. Thus the recession began with a house price bubble that hit overcrowded Britain as it did under-crowded America. It was nothing like as bad in overcrowded Germany or Japan. In each case what drove the bubble, or restrained it, was not supply, but reckless lending.
Likewise the much-quoted figure of 250,000 extra houses "needed" in England each year is taken as implying that they must be built afresh. But new-build will be a pin-prick against the awesome stock of existing properties, and those empty and under-used. Any voyage through post-industrial Britain is one of despair at the failure of housing and planning policies to use land efficiently, to regenerate cities and infill suburbs.
The coalition has made some strides. It is right to make it easier to change buildings to residential use, and allow a degree of "garden grabbing". For the first time a government has tried to tackle the misallocation and under-occupancy of social housing, albeit hamfistedly with a bedroom "tax". Housing subsidies should go to the poor. Labour did nothing on this score. The truth is that Britain’s housing finance is a mess. Housing is like crime, a realm of policy that is gripped not by reason but by political psychology. Osborne may indeed summon his spirits from the dungeons, but will they come?
Which of the following does NOT support the author’s conclusion "Britain’s housing finance is a mess"(para. 9)?
选项
A、Subsidizing home ownership leads to inflation and housing bubbles.
B、It distorts the nation’s capital accumulation towards the building of houses.
C、It leaves less money to help those in real housing need.
D、Home ownership has established itself as the centre ground in national economy.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/GaCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Johnisreluctanttotakethefinalsteptosolvethisproblem,becauseheknowsclearlythatitmeanstheirrevocablebreaking
Expressionismisanartisticstyleinwhichtheartistseekstodepictnotobjectiverealitybutratherthesubjectiveemotions
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
下面你将听到的是一段有关中国经济社会发展的讲话。中国的改革开放已经走过了26个年头。26年来,中国发生了翻天覆地的变化。中国经济持续快速增长,国内生产总值从不到1500亿美元增长到1.65万亿美元。进出口总额从206亿美元增长到1.15
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939andhaspublishedmorethan40poems.
科学家声称,动物,包括人类,生命可以延长五倍。如果这一理论是正确的,未来人类预期寿命可达150年。关键词汇:claim:声称;normalperiod:正常成长期;life-span:寿命。这句话的难点就是把这些词翻译出来。
著名实业家阿瑟泰格的办公室周末遭劫,少量现金失窃,办公室内一片狼藉。关键词汇:prominent:有名的,著名的;bebrokeninto:被偷盗了;interriblemess:很乱,杂乱。这句话的难点是里面出现的一些难点词汇较难翻译,比如前面提
A、ToattempttotransfertoProfessorAtkins’class.B、Tocutbackonhisclasses.C、Togetajobatthelibraryshelvingbooks.
过去七年中,中国的房地产业经历了前所未有的泡沫现象和过热问题。以上海为例,七年前,上海市房屋均价仅为每平方米4000元左右,然而七年后的今天则已飙升至8600元。这个价格对于那些月薪不足四千但却渴望在上海拥有一套属于自己的体面、舒适的栖身之所的工薪阶层来说
Afullmoonwasshiningdownonthejungle.AccompaniedonlybyanIndianguide,theAmericanexplorerandarchaeologistEdward
随机试题
A.烧伤患者出现黑便B.剧烈恶心、呕吐后出现呕血、黑便C.因腰痛自服芬必得后出现黑便D.肝硬化患者用力解大便后出现呕血、黑便Curling溃疡的出血是
有关灰黄霉素的错误叙述项是
与湿喷砂法除锈相比,干喷砂法的特点有()。
在社会主义市插经济条件下,工程建设定额的作用是()。
有一出口合同币制为日元,进口商开来的信用证金额换算成美元表示,出口商没要求修改信用证,出运时制作单据应()。
交货的准时性是整个供应链能否快速满足用户需求的一个必要条件。()
在VisualFoxPro中,下面描述正确的是( )。
存储24*24点阵的一个汉字信息,需要的字节数是()。
A、thedesiretoraiseoilpricesB、theconsiderationthatthedemandmaydecreaseC、OPEC’sproductioncapabilityD、thefactthat
JuniorCollegeStudentsVS.Undergraduates1.目前专科生就业率高于本科生2.出现这一现象的原因3.我的观点
最新回复
(
0
)