2. 考研
  3. [A]Many studies conclude that children with highly involved fathers, in relation to children with less involved fathers, tend to

[A]Many studies conclude that children with highly involved fathers, in relation to children with less involved fathers, tend to

admin2019-06-26  18
问题    [A]Many studies conclude that children with highly involved fathers, in relation to children with less involved fathers, tend to be more cognitively and socially competent, less inclined toward gender stereotyping, more empathic, and psychologically better adjusted. Commonly, these studies investigate both paternal warmth and paternal involvement and find—using simple correlations—that the two variables are related to each other and to youth outcomes.
   [B]Boys seemed to conform to the sex-role standards of their culture when their relationships with their fathers were warm, regardless of how "masculine" the fathers were, even though warmth and intimacy have traditionally been seen as feminine characteristics. A similar conclusion was suggested by research on other aspects of psychosocial adjustment and on achievement: Paternal warmth or closeness appeared beneficial , whereas paternal masculinity appeared irrelevant.
   [C]The critical question is: How good is the evidence that fathers’ amount of involvement, without taking into account its content and quality, is consequential for children, mothers, or fathers themselves? The associations with desirable outcomes found in much research are actually with positive forms of paternal involvement, not involvement per se. Involvement needs to be combined with qualitative dimensions of paternal behavior through the concept of "positive paternal involvement" developed here.
   [D]Commonly, researchers assessed the masculinity of fathers and of sons and then correlated the two sets of scores. Many behavioral scientists were surprised to discover that no consistent results emerged from this research until they examined the quality of the father-son relationship. Then they found that when the relationship between masculine fathers and their sons was warm and loving, the boys were indeed more masculine. Later, however, researchers found that the masculinity of fathers per se did not seem to make much difference after all. As summarized by:
   [E]The second domain in which a substantial amount of research has been done on the influence of variations in father love deals with father involvement, that is, with the amount of time that fathers spend with their children(engagement), the extent to which fathers make themselves available to their children(accessibility), and the extent to which they take responsibility for their children’ s care and welfare(responsibility).
   [F]It is unclear from these studies whether involvement and warmth make independent or joint contributions to youth outcomes. Moreover, "caring for" children is not necessarily the same thing as "caring about" them. Indeed, Lamb concluded from his review of studies of paternal involvement that it was not the simple fact of paternal engagement(i.e., direct interaction with the child), availability, or responsibility for child care that was associated with these outcomes. Rather, it appears that the quality of the father-child relationship made the greatest difference. J. H. Pleck reiterated this conclusion when he wrote:
   [G]Research by Veneziano and Rohner supports these conclusions. In a biracial sample of 63 African American and European American children, the authors found from multiple regression analyses that father involvement by itself was associated with children’ s psychological adjustment primarily insofar as it was perceived by youths to be an expression of paternal warmth(acceptance).
   [H]Many studies looking exclusively at the influence of variations in father love deal with two topics-.(1)gender role development and(2)father involvement. Studies of gender role development emerged prominently in the 1940s and continued through the 1970s. This was a time when fathers were considered to be especially important as gender role models for sons.
   Order:
   
选项
答案F
解析 再判断C项和F项的前后顺序。这两段的内容很相似，都强调除了父亲的参与性，还要考虑父子关系的质量。F项主要论述了，参与性与温情这两个变量中哪一个影响青少年的成长结果还不确定。莱姆认为父子关系的质量而非参与性是决定因素。而由F项的末句“普拉克重申这种说法时写道”可知，后面的内容继续围绕这一话题展开论述，因此F项应该排在前面。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/GHH7FFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)