首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2010-01-13
63
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/FLgjFFFM
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
无痛性肉眼血尿最多见的原因是
Themediacanimpactcurrentevents.AsagraduatestudentatBerkeleyinthe1960s,Irememberexperiencingtheeventsrelated
Learningdisabilitiesareverycommon.Theyaffectperhaps10percentofallchildren.Fourtimesasmanyboysasgirlshavelea
Learningdisabilitiesareverycommon.Theyaffectperhaps10percentofallchildren.Fourtimesasmanyboysasgirlshavelea
Heisan______boy,alwaysinsistingonhisownrightsandopinions.
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsaboutMyApproachtoPerson
InternationalstudentsinChinausuallyhaveahardtimewritingChinesecharactersofnumerous______.
LyndonB.Johnson(was)theonlyUnitedStatesPresident(who)oathof(office)as(administered)byawomanJudgecalledSarah
(Writing)inaclearandtersestyle,thebook(describes)the(author’s)childhoodexperiencesinasmalltown(justbefore)th
A.professionalB.asC.writingA.reachtheirpersonaland【T1】______goalsB.hastrouble【T2】______C.aslow-tech【T3】_
随机试题
Inwhatwaycanwemakeamachineintelligent?Whatdoesthewriterthinkaboutmachineswithhuman-likeability?
以下何项是瘀血阻滞多寐的特点
关于余压凝结水系统,以下说法错误的是()。
()是给予中国出口制成品和半制成品普遍优惠制度的国家。
下列关于税务行政复议听证的说法不正确的是()。
刘某2019年取得中奖所得12000元,另外获得父母赠送的房屋1套,房地产赠与合同上标明的赠与房屋价值为120万元,赠与过程中刘某支付相关税费20万元。则刘某应缴纳个人所得税()元。
81,64,121,36,( ),16
这个世界,有一个曼妙而落寞的借口,叫如果。失败者在如果中可以打捞到成功的_______,后悔者在如果中可以看见当初的_______。但不管是什么,结果都已冷冷地摆在那里。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
有一篇文章这样写道:“在元代,有这样脍炙人口的名句:‘落霞与孤鹜齐飞,秋水共长天一色。’”有个人看了这段话立即说“错了”,他的根据是()。
计算∫12dxsin(πx/2y)dy+∫24dxsin(πx/2y)dy.
最新回复
(
0
)