首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
45
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/E5nsFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
YouwillhearaconversationbetweenMissGreen,aneducationaljournalist,andProfessorWilson,anexpertineducationalstudi
FewwritersareasreveredasJaneAusten.AccordingtoapollinMarch,PrideandPrejudice—aromancewithoutasinglekiss—is
YouwillhearaspeechbyBobChase,PresidentoftheNationalEducationAssociation(NEA)totheAmericanAssociationofColleges
YouwillhearaninterviewwithStevenCasey,onhumanfactorsindesign.Asyoulisten,answerthequestionsorcompletetheno
WhendidMr.Schallerbecomeinterestedinanimals?
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
ToproducetheupheavalintheUnitedStatesthatchangedandmodernizedthedomainofhighereducationfromthemid-1860’sto
Supermarketshoppershaveneverbeenmorespoiltforchoice.Butjustwhenwethoughttraditionalsystemsofselectivefanningh
SoftwarepiracyproblemsexistandhavebeenexacerbatedinrecentyearsduetoISoverload,decentralizedpurchasing,budgetc
Whatdoeseachvanitystampcost?
随机试题
钢管无损探伤和强度试验后应进行焊口防腐,()不能用作防腐层的涂料。
1)______theCommunicativeApproach2)______theAudiolingualMethod3)______theOralApproach4)______the
药物在血浆中与血浆蛋白结合后()。
刘某和孙某系好友,孙某在非洲经营多个业务,其中包括黄金开采。刘某告知孙某国内黄金行情很好,两人遂决定将非洲的黄金进口国内贩卖,但是贵重金属关税较高,两人遂决定从非洲直接将黄金绕关运进中国。孙某从非洲前后三次走私黄金,市值共计500万元。对孙某的行为如何评价
在厦门港施工的某工地项目经理部跟踪到西北太平洋面上有一热带气旋在活动,并且得悉该工地于未来48h以内,遭遇风力可能达到6级以上。问题:为了赶工期,该工地项目经理考虑热带气旋不一定经过厦门港,命令施工船舶抓紧时间施工,请问项目经理这样做对吗?为
旅游者抢救无效死亡,由()向死者家属及死者的好友详细报告抢救经过。
简述遗赠抚养协议的特征。
2007年10月15日,胡锦涛在十七大报告中指出,加快推进社会建设的重点是
【】是从二维表列的方向进行的运算。
【S1】【S10】
最新回复
(
0
)