首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
36
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/E5nsFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Somemoderncitiesareusuallyfamousforpeoplewholiveaverylongtime.
Ontheheelsofitsrecentdecisiontocriminalizeconsumerswhoripsongsfromalbumstheyhavepurchasedtotheircomputers(or
FewwritersareasreveredasJaneAusten.AccordingtoapollinMarch,PrideandPrejudice—aromancewithoutasinglekiss—is
Whatarethetwospeakersdiscussing?
Whyisitnecessarytogiveacointosomeonewhenyougivehimapresentwithasharpedgeorpoint?
Answerquestions71-80byreferringtothesynopsesof4differentbooksonenvironmentaleconomicsinapublisher’sbrochure.A
TodayTVaudiencesallovertheworldareaccustomedtothesightofAmericanastronautsintip-topcondition,withfairhair,c
SoftwarepiracyproblemsexistandhavebeenexacerbatedinrecentyearsduetoISoverload,decentralizedpurchasing,budgetc
【B1】ThefreeenterprisesystemhasproducedatechnologycapableofprovidingtheAmericanconsumerwiththelargestandmostva
Whatdoeseachvanitystampcost?
随机试题
下列哪项是构成x线照片影像的几何因素
斌斌和轩轩出生时身高、体重差不多,到两岁时,斌斌长得高高胖胖的,轩轩却瘦瘦小小的,这说明学前儿童的生长具有()规律。
无菌包在未污染情况下,可保存
( )指的是把经营战略的重点放在一个特定的目标市场上,为特定的地区或特定的消费群体提供特殊的产品或服务。
关于收入的特征,以下正确的是()。
长期国债的偿还期限一般为()。
小包价旅游,又称选择性旅游,它由非选择部分和可选择部分组成,其中非选择部分包括()。
简述一堂好课的标准。
什么是诉讼时效的中止?[浙江工大2018年研]
Jay:Ofcoursetherearemanygoodreasonstosupporttheexpansionofpreventivemedicalcare,butargumentsclaimingthatitw
最新回复
(
0
)