No one should be forced to wear a uniform under any circumstance. Uniforms are demanding to the human spirit and totally unneces

admin2010-07-14  38

问题     No one should be forced to wear a uniform under any circumstance. Uniforms are demanding to the human spirit and totally unnecessary in a democratic society. Uniforms tell the world that the person who wears one has no value as an individual but only lives to function as a part of a whole. The individual in a uniform loses all self-worth.
    There are those who say that wearing a uniform gives a person a sense of identification with a larger, more important concept. What could be more important than the individual himself? If an organization is so weak that it must rely on cloth and buttons to inspire its members, that organization has no right to continue its existence. Others say that the practice of making persons wear uniforms, say, in a school, eliminates all envy and competition in the matter of dress, such that a poor person who cannot afford good-quality clothing is not to be belittled by a wealthy person who wears expensive, quality clothing. Those persons conveniently ignore such critical concepts as freedom of choice, motivation, and individuality. If all persons were to wear the same clothing, why would anyone strive to be better? It is only a short step from forcing everyone to wear the same clothing, to forcing everyone to drive the same car, have the same type of house, eat the same types of foods. When this happens, all incentive to improve one’s life is removed. Why would parents bother to work hard so that their children could have a better life than they had when they know that their children are going to be forced to have exactly the same life that they had?
    Uniforms also hurt the economy. Right now, billions of dollars are spent on the fashion industry yearly. Thousands of persons are employed in designing, creating and marketing different types of clothing. If everyone were forced to wear uniforms, artistic personnel would be unnecessary. Sales persons would be superfluous as wells why bother to sell the only items that are available? The wearing of uniforms would destroy the fashion industry, which in turn would have a ripple effect on such industries as advertising and promotion. Without advertising, newspapers, magazines, and television would not be able to remain in business. Our entire information and entertainment industry would collapse.
With which of the following would the author most likely disagree?

选项 A、Persons have the right to dress as they please and flaunt their wealth if they choose to do so.
B、Individuality is a luxury that a large society can no longer afford.
C、Organizations must have more intrinsic worth than wearing a uniform would suggest.
D、The media depend on the sale of clothing, if only in an indirect way.

答案B

解析 推理题。根据文章前两段,作者认为穿着制服不利于展现人的个性,而B项指出个性是奢侈品,在一个大的社会中难以保持,明显与作者看法相反。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/CvFMFFFM
0

最新回复(0)