首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
20
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/CpasFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
BeforeMikebecameanactor,whatkindofschooldidhegoto?
TherearesomesocialproblemsintheUnitedStates.Anddrugabusehascometobe【21】______asoneofthemostchallengingsoc
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
Inthe18thcentury,NewYorkwassmallerthanPhiladephiaandBoston.TodayitisthelargestcityinAmerica.Howtoexplain
Thehealth-careeconomyisfullwithunusualandevenuniqueeconomicrelationship.Oneoftheleastunderstoodinvolvesthepec
Inthe1950s,thepioneersofartificialintelligence(AI)predictedthat,bytheendofthiscentury,computerswouldbeconversi
Friday本题答案信息也是隐含在最后一个话轮男士的最后一句中:...orjustcomehereonthenextmorningtogettheresult。这一题与上一题的听音和答题紧密相关,因为前面说的是Thursday(星期
ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,unfortunately,madethesearchforlegalprotectionfromimportcompetitionintoamajorline
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
随机试题
混合溶剂的极性参数具有算术加和性,在二元溶剂系统,设a为非极性组分,b为极性较强的组分,则此混合溶剂的极性参数Pab’为Pab’=φaPa’+φbPb’则φ为溶剂组分的()。
原位癌是指
A.代谢性酸中毒B.代谢性碱中毒C.呼吸性酸中毒D.呼吸性碱中毒pH升高,HCO3-下降,PCO2下降
诊断癔症最重要的是
区分特定之债和种类之债的意义在于,特定物在交付前灭失的,债权人不能请求实际履行而只能要求赔偿,种类物在交付前灭失的,债权人一般仍可请求实际履行。( )
塑料受热软化或熔融成型,不再受热软化,称热固性塑料,以下哪种塑料属于热固性塑料?
水泥路面应根据道路交通等级和路基抗冲刷能力来选择基层材料,下列选择不当的是()。
关于建设工程专利权保护范围的说法,正确的是()。
阅读下列说明,回答问题,将解答填入答题纸的对应栏内。【说明】某电子商务企业拟开发一套销售系统,该系统的部分功能及初步需求分析的结果如下所述:1.会员信息包括会员号、姓名、性别、身份证号、电话、积分。其中会员号唯一标识会员关系中的每一个元组。2.员工
ItissaidthatGeorgeWashingtonwasoneofthefirsttorealizehowimportantthebuildingofcanalswouldbetothenation’s
最新回复
(
0
)