首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
15
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/CpasFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
【61】Behindtheforthcomingwaroverprotectingpatients’recordsinanageofHealthMaintenanceOrganizationsandonlinemedic
Whydidtheartificiallanguagesappear?
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
WhowillselecttheBestActresswinnerinAcademyAwards?
Inthelateyearsofthenineteenthcentury,"capital"and"labour"wereenlargingandperfectingtheirrivalorganizationsonm
Doanimalshavefights?Thisishowthequestionisusuallyput.Itseemsauseful,ground-clearingwaytostart.【61】Actually,
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallygoodscienceitisimpossibletopredict.Ifthethi
Inthe1950s,thepioneersofartificialintelligence(AI)predictedthat,bytheendofthiscentury,computerswouldbeconversi
Galaxiesarethemajor’buildingblocksOftheuniverse:Agalaxyisgiantfamilyofmanymillionsofstars,anditisheld
AlthoughCoca-ColaCo.spentnearly$2billionlastyearadvertisingitsvariousbrandsaroundtheglobe,itsawitsshareoft
随机试题
法在特定效力范围内只要尚未失效便能反复适用。这体现了法的()
病人症见酷暑时身热汗多,口渴心烦,小便短赤,体倦少气,苔黄少滓,脉虚数。治疗应首选
患者,男,71岁,身体不适到医院就诊,医生开具处方,处方里含有雄黄,雄黄的功效有
著作权人享有的著作权包括()。
发行人应按规定披露近()年内是否存在违法违规行为,若存在违法违规行为,应披露违规事实和受到处罚的情况,并说明对发行人的影响。
20×4年1月1日,乙建筑公司与客户签订一项固定造价建造合同,承建一幢办公楼,预计20×5年6月30日完工;合同总金额为32000万元,预计合同总成本为28000万元。20×5年4月28日,工程提前完工并符合合同要求,客户同意支付奖励款400万元。截至20
甲、乙均为完全民事行为能力人,甲、乙之间的下列约定中,能够产生法律上的权利义务的有()。
(2016年)某油田开采企业2016年3月销售天然气90万立方米,取得不含增值税收入1350000元,另向购买方收取手续费1695元,延期付款利息2260元。假设天然气的资源税税率为10%,该企业2016年3月销售天然气应缴纳的资源税为()元。
工作分析的结果是产生________。
给定材料材料1:2017年8月18日,民政部网站公布了指定的慈善组织互联网公开募捐信息平台上半年运营情况,13家指定平台半年来总筹款额超过7.5亿元。据统计,1—6月,13家指定平台共为全国两百多家公募慈善组织及其合作机构发布
最新回复
(
0
)