首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
admin
2012-11-20
27
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad as or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933 there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down abolished by an amendment (修正案) to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever-- often poisonous alcohol.
On December 5th, 1993 they repealed (撤销) prohibition by ratifying (批准) the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
During prohibition, people ______.
选项
A、lived in fear of the law
B、were willing to risk arrest for the pleasure of liquor
C、recklessly endangered their communities
D、were respectful of the legal sanctions placed on them
答案
B
解析
从第三段的开首句可知B项为正确选择。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/BJuGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Teachersshouldbe_____withtheirstudentsbutshouldnotbe_____onthem.
—Ididn’tdowellinthelastEnglishtestHowaboutyou?
—Whydoyouwantthebooksomuch?—______,sir.
______theirhomework,thechildrenwentforawalk.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
Likethebody,thememoryimproveswithuse.Unlikethebody,thememorycanimprovewithage.Formanyyears,doctorshave
Mary,accompaniedbyherbrothers,______warmlywelcomedbytheaudience.
Whatisthe’biggestcityintheworld?Thatis,【21】cityhasthelargestpopulation?Thisseemslike【22】questiontoanswer,but
Itishightimethatwe______allreadyforthisafternoonmeeting,______itwouldbelate.
Myparentsalwaysbuy______mybirthday.
随机试题
Theaimofaletterofapplication(求职信)istohelpyouto"sell"yourself.Itshouldstate【21】thejobyouwant,andshouldtell
A.实喘B.哮喘C.虚寒呃逆D.胃虚有热之呃逆E.胃气虚弱,痰浊内阻证
甲对乙享有2006年8月10日到期的6万元债权,到期后乙无力清偿。乙对丙享有5万元债权,清偿期已届满7个月,但乙未对丙采取法律措施。乙对丁还享有5万元人身损害赔偿请求权。后乙去世,无其他遗产,遗嘱中将上述10万元的债权赠与戊。对此,下列哪些选项是正确的?(
关于公告,下列哪些选项是正确的?
安全生产责任的行政处分主要是对()过错的制裁。
不属于路基质量检验中土方路基实测项目的是()。
对培训教师进行内部开发的优点有()。
被告人甲系被告单位上海A公司的法定代表人、实际经营者。2020年1月初,该公司以每盒5.125元的价格购入一批一次性使用无纺布口罩(规格:50只/盒),在公司网络店铺以每盒7元的价格销售。1月23日至29日间,甲将上述口罩的销售价格,陆续涨至每盒21元至每
TheLightIndustrialproductsImport&ExportCorporationStaffordStreetWolverHamptonWVI1SBTel:(01902)322479Fax:(01902)
A—ReceptionistB—SecretaryC—KeyPuncherD—TypistE—StenographerF—Telephon
最新回复
(
0
)