首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2017-01-15
39
问题
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeep and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants; "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism. " If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U. S. , warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example; "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, And May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings("Smckers die earlier")or esteem-related warnings("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid(病态的)warning on a cigarette label may actually backfire.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou(自以为是的)customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to Christian Jarrett, which of the following signs can make a student motivated by self-esteem stop smoking?
选项
A、Cherish Your Health, Stop Smoking
B、Smoking Makes Your Heart Stop Earlier
C、Enjoy a Cigarette, Regret a Whole Life
D、You Look More Charming Without a Cigarette
答案
D
解析
推理题。第五段第六句说明了Christian Jarrett的研究结果:从抽烟中获得自尊心的那些学生,当他们看到与死亡相关的警告和那些与自尊心相关的警告的时候,前者会令他们更加积极地看待吸烟。据此可以推出,[D]“不吸烟,你看上去更有吸引力”是属于与自尊心相关的警示牌,故为正确答案。[A]“珍惜你的健康,停止吸烟”、[B]“吸烟使你更早地死亡”和[C]“享受一支烟,后悔一辈子”均是与死亡有关的警示牌,所以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/AhnMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whenshewasdrivinghome,shewasstoppedbythepolicemanandwas______ofspeeding.
Chaplinwasnotjustagenius;hewasamongthemost______figuresinfilmhistory.
Smokingissoharmfultohealththatitkills______eachyearthanautomobileaccidents.
Yourwaystosolvethisproblem,______,seemprettyeffective.
AmericanHistoryisoneoftheelectivestudiesintheuniversity______.
Nowadaysaftergraduationmanyhighlyeducatedyoungmenbecomemembersoftheanttribe.Theyhavealowincomeandlivetogeth
Accordingtothepassage,asurveyaboutbutterfliesiscarriedonby______.
Accordingtothepassage,somejobapplicantswererejected______.
Accordingtothepassage,ifoneenjoyslife,he/sheissuretoprefer______.
随机试题
刘某,男,57岁。中风后经治遗留音喑失语,心悸,气短及腰膝酸软。方药宜选
灭菌的含义是指
与心相表里的是
我国首部建设工程项目管理的规范性文件《建设工程项目管理规范》(GB/T50326—2001)由建设部和国家质量监督检验检疫总局联合颁布,并于()开始实施。
对于超过3年纳税调整的暂时性差异,企业应当对递延所得税资产和递延所得税负债进行折现。()
对《天朝田亩制度》和孙中山“平均地权”政策评价正确的是()。
下列选项中,关于课程的说法不正确的一项是()。
提拉克
地理学家和历史学家过去一直持有的观点认为南极第一次是在1820年左右被发现的,但是有些16世纪欧洲地图上显示着与南极相似的一片地域,虽然那时的探险家从未见到过它。因此有些学者争论说该大陆是被古代人发现并画到地图上,而大家知道这些古人的地图曾对欧洲制作地图者
TheLostArtofListeningA)"Whywon’theevenlistentomyidea?","WhyamIcutoffbeforeIprovidethewholestory?"How
最新回复
(
0
)