首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-06-14
25
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
The government can’t take bank crisis for granted mainly because
选项
A、it may lead to the incredible damage.
B、it may cause a wider panic.
C、banks lose more than average firms.
D、it often happen during depression.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/AEYYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtostatistics,womenonthejobmarketmake,onaverage,75centsforeverydollarmenmakefortheequivalentjobs.T
WhichofthefollowingisTRUE?
WhichwordisnotusedbyNorberg-HodgetodescribetheLadakhipeople?
A、hatedcomputersB、onlyhadsomebasicknowledgeofcomputersC、wasacomputergeekD、wasteachingmathsandwritingA被访者提到从前曾
ThemoststrikingphoneticdifferencebetweenAmericanandBritishEnglishisthepronunciationof______inwords.
Theword"language"issometimesusedtorefertothewholeofaperson’slanguage.Thisiscalled
Inrecentyears,railroadshavebeencombiningwitheachother,mergingintosuper-systems,causingheightenedconcernsaboutm
Thebizarreanticsofsleepwalkershavepuzzledpolice,perplexedscientists,andfascinatedwritersforcenturies.Thereisan
最令人触目惊心的一件事,是看着钟表上的秒针一下一下地移动,每移动一下就是表示我们的寿命缩短了一部分。再看看墙上挂着的可以一张张撕下的日历,每天撕下一张就表示我们的寿命缩短了一天。因为时问即生命。没有人不爱惜生命,但很少人珍视他的时间。如果想在有生之年做一点
Completethegap-fillingtask.SomeofthegapsbelowmayrequireamaximumofTHREEwords.Make.suretheword(s)youfill.in
随机试题
发生灾害事故时,把人民群众的财产安全放在第一位,全力抢救受困群众,防范次生灾害,努力减少人员伤亡。()
非定期维护一般包括走合维护、()维护和长期停驶或封存汽车的维护。
初产妇第二产程不应超过活跃期延长是指此期超过
斜刺是指进针时针身与皮肤表面的角度为()
通常用于细菌学检验的标本可于4℃存放2~3天。()
【真题(中级)】下列有关审计独立性的表述,正确的是()。
无商业价值的广告品及货样,经海关审核无误后可以免征关税。()
某化肥厂生产一批化肥,原计划每天生产4.5吨,可以按时完成任务。结果每天产量提高到6吨,只用15天就完成任务。问比原计划的时间提前几天完成?( )
设一个工程由两个窗体组成,其名称分别为Fornm1和Fornm2,在Fomm1上有一个名称为Commandl的命令按钮。窗体Fornm1的程序代码如下:PrivateSubCommandl_Click()PrivateSubg(fA
Consideringtheirvastnumbersintheseventeenthcentury,notmuchsheepareraisedinSpaintoday.
最新回复
(
0
)