Data has a habit of spreading. It slips past military security and it can also leak from WikiLeaks. It even slipped past the ban

admin2017-12-11  46

问题    Data has a habit of spreading. It slips past military security and it can also leak from WikiLeaks. It even slipped past the bans of the Guardian and other media organisations involved in this story when a rogue copy of Der Spiegel accidentally went on sale in Basle, Switzerland. Someone bought it, realised what they had, and began scanning the pages, translating them from German to English and posting up-dates on Twitter. It would seem digital data respects no authority, be it the Pentagon, WikiLeaks or a newspaper editor.
   Individually, we have all already experienced the massive changes resulting from digitisation. Events or information that we once considered momentary and private are now accumulated, permanent, public. Governments hold our personal data in huge databases. It used to cost money to disclose and distribute information. In the digital age it costs money not to.
   But when data breaches happen to the public, politicians don’t care much. Our privacy is expendable. It is no surprise that the reaction to these leaks is different. What has changed the dynamic of power in a revolutionary way isn’t just the scale of the databases being kept, but that individuals can upload a copy and present it to the world.
   To some this marks a crisis, to others an opportunity. Technology is breaking down traditional social barriers of status, class, power, wealth and geography—replacing them with an ethos of collaboration and transparency.
   Leaks are not the problem; they are the symptom. They reveal a disconnect between what people want and need to know and what they actually do know. The greater the secrecy, the more likely a leak. The way to move beyond leaks is to ensure a strong managing system for the public to access important information.
   We are at a key moment where the visionaries in the leading position of a global digital age are clashing with those who are desperate to control what we know. WikiLeaks is the guerrilla front in a global movement for greater transparency and participation. It used to be that a leader controlled citizens by controlling information. Now it’ s harder than ever for the powerful to control what people read, see and hear. Technology gives people the ability to band together and challenge authority. The powerful have long spied on citizens as a means of control, now citizens are turning their collected eyes back upon the powerful.
   This is a revolution, and all revolutions create fear and uncertainty. Will we move to a New Information Enlightenment or will the strong resistance from those who seek to maintain control no matter the cost lead us to a new totalitarianism? What happens in the next five years will define the future of democracy for the next century, so it would be well if our leaders responded to the current challenge with an eye on the future.
The story about leak from WikiLeaks suggests that digital data is

选项 A、getting used to leaking out.
B、immune to authority.
C、difficult to accumulate.
D、being disclosed for free.

答案B

解析 细节题。第一段第二至四句叙述维基解密事件,第五句总结指出,数字信息不尊重任何权 威,即其对权威免疫,B选项符合文意。A偷换概念,第一段首句指出信息习惯于传播,而不是泄 露;维基解密事件只是个别事件,并不是普遍现象。第二段第二句表明,数字化使得信息便于积 累,C选项和文意相悖。第二段最后两句指出过去人们为了揭露和散布信息花钱,而现在为了阻 止数字信息泄露而花钱,只是为了对比说明现在数字信息传播之快,无法由此推知现在揭露数 字信息是免费的,排除D选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/9TX7FFFM
0

最新回复(0)