首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthroug
admin
2013-11-30
55
问题
Genetically modified crops and foods having been launched by big companies bent on taking over agriculture, this new breakthrough in science poses a new problem—whether it’ s safe for people to eat them. Experts say that much of the current angst over genetically modified foods is unnecessary. If research and development are allowed to continue, the products will be there for all to appreciate.
New varieties of rice and other crops, resistant to insects and diseases, will have replaced those cultivated today. Farmers will no longer lose substantial proportions of their harvests. The impact of these advances will be felt in the less developed countries. Health benefits will also come from plants genetically engineered to be more balanced nutritionally than those that have evolved through natural selection or been bred by traditional methods.
The potential medical spin-offs from plant biotechnology are considerable. A new generation of more potent vaccines, many against illness for which no vaccines have been available, will be grown in plants such as maize and bananas.
Malnutrition could be banished. Biotechnology can improve efficiency of food production and generate more nourishing crops.
Throughout the world, gardeners, vegetarians, and consumers will benefit from plant varieties resistant to spoilage, foods which reduce our dependence on animals, and cheaper and/or tastier products.
We should not, however, overlook potential hazards in altering our diets by genetic engineering. As with all other applications of science to human welfare, biotechnology is likely to have risks. Mistakes will probably be made.
Nevertheless, any analysis of the new techniques for ferrying genes between plants must surely conclude that they are being applied and controlled more stringently than any technology ever before.
Nearly 25 years ago, when scientists first learned to combine DNA from different sources, commentators warned of the iniquity of "opening Pandora’ s box". Among their horrific forecast were unstoppable epidemics and worldwide pestilence. None of these has come to pass, partly because genetic manipulation has not proved inherently dangerous.
In addition, regulatory committees have been set up to ensure that experiments are conducted in appropriately safe conditions.
The regulators’ task is not simply to allow research to go ahead unless potential hazards are obvious. It is to consider risks that could come to light later. Will a gene, introduced intorape to protect it against virus attack, also make the pollen grains more likely to cause hay fever? All proposals have to survive positive vetting of this sort before they are sanctioned.
Genetic engineering is far more precise—and thus predictable—than the gene movements which occur in nature. When plants fertilize and cross-fertilize in the wild, large numbers of genes are transferred in a haphazard fashion.
Biotechnology allows individual genes to be moved with precision from one plant to another. It is much easier to know how one gene will work in its new setting. The likelihood of unexpected consequences and the margin of error are correspondingly reduced. There is a chance, however remote, that a gene introduced into a particular plant at one time and location might have adverse consequences if it eventually gets into another plant distant in space and time.
Given the astronomical amount of random gene transfer which occurs through the biosphere such extreme caution is unwarranted. I believe most food producers—and eaters—would agree.
Despite the possibility of introduction of a gene into a particular plant at one time and location, the author contends that such extreme caution about genetic technology is unwarranted because______.
选项
A、there are regulatory committees
B、in labs gene ferrying is being applied and controlled stringently
C、genetic engineering is far more precise than the natural gene movement
D、the possibility of such an event is too small
答案
C
解析
从第十一段Genetic engineering is far more precise than the gene movements which occurin nature可直接找出答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/8GNDFFFM
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
患者上腹被汽车撞伤3小时,面色苍白,四肢厥冷,血压50/35mmHg,脉搏:118次/分,全腹压痛及反跳痛。目前应考虑该患者最可能的诊断是
与硅沉着病发病关系最密切的细胞是
Imagineadiseasespreadingacrosstheglobe,killingmostlymiddle-agedpeopleorleavingthemchronicallydisabled.Thenoned
Ihadneverbeeninthepublicwardofahospitalbefore,anditwasmyfirstexperienceofdoctorswhohandleyouwithoutspeak
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
ManyCanadiansenjoytheluxuryofalargeamountoflivingspace.Canadaisvast,andthehomesarelargeaccordingtothestan
Wewereshockedatthephysician’scallousdisregardforthehumandimensionofmedicine.
A、Currentsmokersexclusively.B、Second-handsmokers.C、Withalungproblem.D、Atage40orover.D根据文中whowerehealthy,atleast
CharlesPaulandhiswife,Hazel,stoppedusingthemotorhometheyboughtseveralyearsago;itsitsidlebehindtheirhousein
A、There’renotenoughchocolatestogoaround.B、Themanhaseatenmorethanthewoman.C、Thewomanwantstoeatthemup.D、The
随机试题
A.肾与膀胱B.肾C.膀胱D.肺、脾、肾水肿的病位是
喹诺酮类抗菌药的主要作用机制是
小柴胡汤中体现一散一收,共解少阳之邪的药物配伍是
人类胚胎干细胞研究和应用中道德争议的焦点问题是
下面属于变动成本的是:
2015年4月,三通公司因环境污染被甲县环保局处以罚款17万元,并责令其在1个月恢复被污染区域。三通公司到期未缴;甲县环保局又对其作出加处罚款3万元的决定,三通公司仍未缴纳。三通公司不服县环保局的处罚决定,向县人民政府申请行政复议,复议决定作出前,三通公司
构成曲式的最小结构单位是()。
专门的学前儿童科学教育活动不包括()。
(96年)求微分方程y"+y’=x2的通解.
下面程序运行后,输出结果为()。Dima()a=Array(1,3,5,7,9)s=0Fori=1To4s=s*10+a(i)NextiPrints
最新回复
(
0
)