Over the past week, the "world’s first" artificial intelligence (AI) news anchor has gone viral online, a robot version of a pre

admin2020-08-17  7

问题     Over the past week, the "world’s first" artificial intelligence (AI) news anchor has gone viral online, a robot version of a presenter at China’s state Xinhua News Agency.
    Lauded for "his" ability to broadcast 24 hours a day, the presenter said he would "work tirelessly to keep you informed. " The anchor was developed by Xinhua and Chinese search engine Sogou. com and launched at the World Internet Conference last week.
    But is this actually a true example of AI? Will Knight, a senior editor for AI at MIT Technology Review, is somewhat skeptical.
    "The use of the term AI is a little bit tricky in this context, because the anchor itself is not intelligent, it doesn’t have any intelligence…But they are using some quite clever kind of machine learning which is a sub-field of AI to capture the likeness of a real anchor and the voice of that anchor," Knight told CNBC by phone.
    When Knight first saw the anchor, he thought it was an impressive piece of mimicry. "The underlying technology for learning how to reproduce faces and voices is quite a sort of fundamental idea, and a quite powerful one potential. "
    If the anchor wrote its own script, that might be a different story. "If it were to get a bunch of reports, take some phone calls and then reproduce it, that would be incredible, but that’s way beyond what machines can do," he added.
    As with any new technology, terms can enter people’s vernacular before they are fully understood. "We should also always be really careful think about the use of the term AI, and in this context you don’t want to suggest that this anchor is actually exhibiting any intelligence, because it’s not, it’s just like a kind of very sophisticated digital puppet," Knight said.
    AI may have created the Xinhua anchor and its voice, but the anchor itself cannot think, Ali Shaf-ti, a research associate in robotics and AI at Imperial College London, told CNBC by phone. "What actually creates those images and the movement of the lips and the voice of this anchor is using algorithms that are related to artificial intelligence. But to call this an AI anchor is slightly overselling it. "
    Defining AI isn’t straightforward, Shafti said. "The term itself is usually defined as a non-human device or algorithm being able to do behaviors and actions that are possible only for a person of human intelligence, or maybe not even possible for humans, so above human intelligence," he said.
    Knight said this is an area that is currently prone to mistakes. "Doing something like writing a report using language is one of the most difficult things you could have a computer do. Language is so powerful and flexible so it’s easy for machines to fall into making lots of errors which you see with chat bots and the like," he told CNBC.
What do the American experts not like about the Chinese invention?

选项 A、It can mimic voices and faces impressively.
B、It can do more than machines.
C、It cannot write its own script.
D、It surpasses its American counterpart in many ways.

答案C

解析 事实细节题。文章第三段第二句提到,奈特是一位杂志社人工智能领域的高级编辑,即奈特是一位美国专家。第六段第一句提到,如果这个“播报员”能有自己的讲话稿,那就另当别论了。可见,美国专家不喜欢中国这个新型“播报员”的原因在于,它不会自己准备新闻演讲稿,故答案为C项。由第五段第二句可知,对于“播报员”能够模仿声音和表情这一技术,美国专家持认同态度,故排除A项。第六段第二句提到,如果这个“播报员”能写报告、接电话等,那它的能力就超过机器所具备的能力。由此可知,“播报员”没有具备超过其他机器的能力,B项表述与文意相悖,故排除。D项文中未提及,故也排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/8EVUFFFM
0

最新回复(0)