首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read carefully the following excerpt on historical buildings, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which y
Read carefully the following excerpt on historical buildings, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which y
admin
2022-01-15
49
问题
Read carefully the following excerpt on historical buildings, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should:
1) Summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then
2) Comment on whether we should protect old historic buildings or not. You should support yourself with information from the excerpt.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Should Hong Kong Demolish WW2-era Buildings?
The Hong Kong authority had wanted to pull down about a dozen World War Two-era buildings, each about three-to-five stories high, to make way for two high-rise residential towers, but it decided on Thursday to withdraw the application.
"The Urban Renewal Authority (URA), a statutory body funded by the Hong Kong government, has heard various opinions from members of the community, and has decided to withdraw the planning application filed earlier," it said in a statement to the BBC.
The authority added that it had not yet decided whether to file a new proposal.
Conservation activist Katty Law, convener of the Central and Western Concern Group, said she was celebrating, even if it was only a temporary victory. "This time, community opposition as well as District Council opposition was enough to stop a really bad scheme," she said in response to the withdrawal. "But this is still a redevelopment area. We really want this whole area to be conserved as a historic neighbourhood, rather than treating it as a dilapidated area."
"This is a very historic neighbourhood," says Dare Koslow, who owns many tenement properties in Hong Kong, including a spacious, airy flat in one of the buildings being slated for possible demolition. "It was rebuilt after the Second World War. It deserves better than to be knocked down to make way for high rises.
选项
答案
The Protection of Old Buildings Many old buildings have been proposed to be knocked down due to their unsafe and unsatisfactory state, just as the Hong Kong authority did. However, according to this excerpt, the proposal is not favoured among the public just to make room for new high rises since the WW2-era buildings have a lot of features unique to their era and of great historical importance. They are advised not just simply to be demolished. In my opinion, protection or replacement depends on the value of old buildings. Those ancient building should be well protected due to their historical value. They are part of our history, displaying how the ancient lived in the past and what features were prioritized in the building. They are not just old buildings. Just as the news reports, it is wrong to replace two old buildings in Hong Kong with modern skyscrapers. This act deliberately neglects the historical value and is just driven by profit. Local governments and related offices did not realize its historical importance in culture. However, for those old buildings with few cultural values, it is better to remove them and give way to new modern ones for greater uses. According to a famous American college with a long history, its two portables have been worn down and still in bad condition though repaired often, which are very uncomfortable to be used for both teachers and students. If replaced with two new modern ones, they may help to provide a better learning environment with advanced learning tools and air conditioners. Therefore, it is a quick decision to reserve or not without careful analysis of the value of the old buildings. Ancient and culturally valued buildings should be conserved and maintained while worn architectures without any value should be demolished and make way for new buildings.
解析
老建筑是应该保护还是拆除,一直都有争论。所给材料是关于香港政府提议推倒二战时期的建筑来建新的高楼大厦,这一提议引起公众的拒绝。支持者们认为作为历史建筑应该保护起来,而不是当作一个破落的地方来对待。在论述过程中,考生们要注意直接提出自己的观点——保护还是拆除,然后围绕材料中的老建筑的历史文化意义来展开论证。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/79zMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Commutershavea40percentgreaterriskofendingupdivorced,accordingtoauniversitystudy.【C1】_____youarereading
Commutershavea40percentgreaterriskofendingupdivorced,accordingtoauniversitystudy.【C1】_____youarereading
Commutershavea40percentgreaterriskofendingupdivorced,accordingtoauniversitystudy.【C1】_____youarereading
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
A.qualifiedB.conductedC.reactionsD.privatelyE.responsesF.employersG.conservativeH.presentlyI.surviveJ.pos
随机试题
工人根据设计蓝图施工时,主要依赖于【】
患者男,19岁。近日发热、肌肉痛,后迅速出现皮肤大片瘀斑,头痛,意识紊乱,少尿,尿色加深,溶血性贫血,诊断为血栓性血小板减少性紫癜。不符合该诊断的实验室检查是
初产妇,29岁。顺利产下一男婴,自诉连续2天发热,多汗,伴下腹阵痛。查体:体温37.5℃,子宫底脐下2指,无压痛,会阴伤口无肿胀及压痛,恶露暗红色,有腥味,双乳胀、有硬结。导致该产妇发热的原因是
原始细胞>30%,过氧化物酶染色阴性或阳性率<3%,无Anet小体,免疫细胞化学MPO阳性,CD13、CD14、CD15、CD33、CD11b中至少有一种阳性。不表达B系和T系特异性抗原,可表达CD34、TdT、HLA—DR。符合上述特征的急性髓细胞性
A.儿童复发性腮腺炎B.舍格伦综合征C.阻塞性腮腺炎D.结核E.腺淋巴瘤符合下列腮腺造影表现的病变是主导管形态正常,分支导管数目较少,末梢导管点状扩张,8年后复查末梢导管点状扩张完全消失
患儿男,2岁。因白血病,肺部感染入院。上午10时测体温39.8℃,给予降温。适宜该患儿进食的食物是()。
甲县造纸厂因超标排放的污染物先后造成8户养殖专业户所养鱼苗大面积死亡,损失12万元。甲县环保局根据《水污染防治法》的规定,对造纸厂作出如下处理决定:(1)赔偿受损害的8户养殖专业户经济损失8万元;(2)罚款2万元;(3)立即对污染严重的生产项目停产整
下列关于期权的有效期和到期日的描述中,不正确的是()。
在中国典籍中,琐罗亚斯德教被称为()。
一日清晨,甲发现一头牛趴在自家门前,便将其拴在自家院内,打探失主未果。时值春耕,甲用该牛耕种自家田地。期间该牛因劳累过度得病,甲花费300元将其治好。两年后,牛的主人乙寻牛来到甲处,要求甲返还,甲拒绝返还。下列哪一说法是正确的()。
最新回复
(
0
)