首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Some experts suggest imposing a tax on pet owners in order to make our cities cleaner but others are against it. Do you think it
Some experts suggest imposing a tax on pet owners in order to make our cities cleaner but others are against it. Do you think it
admin
2020-09-01
44
问题
Some experts suggest imposing a tax on pet owners in order to make our cities cleaner but others are against it. Do you think it’s OK to impose an annual tax on pet owners? The following are opinions from different sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in NO LESS THAN 300 WORDS, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the opinions from different sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Write your article on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
Excerpt 1
Pet Owners
Mixamixa (Finland): Although some pet owners cannot take good care of their pets and remove their waste, it is not fair to force all pet owners to pay for some owners who don’t obey the rules.
Sikaote (China): Now many people regard their pets as their family members, especially the seniors who don’t live with their children. For the seniors who are poor, the tax will significantly increase their financial burden and may make their life lonelier because they may lose their only friend.
Excerpt 2
Non-pet Owners
Msrong (the US): Some foreign countries have already levied an annual tax on pet owners and I think we can learn from them. One of the most important reasons for doing so is that the previous efforts to get pets registered or the awareness campaigns have not been effective to make pet owners clean their pets’ waste.
BlondeAmber (Ireland): Raising pets does bring the pet owners quite a lot of benefits. Nevertheless, when it comes to the public interest, we have to say it will lead to more problems. Domestic dogs have posed a threat to morning and evening walkers as most of the time they are more dangerous than stray dogs and it is reported that about 80,000 people are bitten by dogs or cats in Wuhan each year. Imposing the pet tax can curb the increasing number of the cases involving dog attacks and reduce the amount of pets’ waste.
Teamkrejados (the US): The money raised by the planned tax would be spent on patrols to ensure that pet owners abide by the legislation and clean up the pets’ waste. It is a good way to make our city much cleaner.
Alexzhou (China): I think we should take measures similar to the limitation on buying private cars. They can rule that the tax will be levied on those pet owners who have more than one or two pets. For those who only have one, they can be exempted from paying the tax.
Excerpt 3
Authorities
Chiyomatsu (a Mayor in Japan): What is the most important is that our city will become cleaner. A crackdown is to go into force immediately and operate in tandem with a campaign to raise the awareness of the importance of owners removing their pets’ waste. If the awareness-raising campaign is not effective, I would like to introduce the tax.
BNN News from Italy: According to the bill, the administration of any given city will be authorized to decide the amount of tax collected from cat and dog owners. According to the authors of this document, it will allow creating funds for the capture and housing of stray animals. Furthermore, it will also provide veterinary aid for stray animals, carrying out their censuses and creating cemeteries. People who take in a cat or a dog from a state nursery will be relieved from paying this tax. According to the authors, city authorities will be able to use tax revenues to provide services for stray cats and dogs.
选项
答案
Is It OK to Impose an Annual Tax on Pet Owners? Due to the increasing complaints from local residents about dog droppings left in the streets, the authorities are to put forward a law to levy an annual tax on pet owners, which has aroused pros and cons from all sides. The pet owners are against it. They say that pets are family members and this one-fits-all policy treats those who clean up after their dogs unfairly. Besides, this tax will increase the financial burden on those who live alone. Contrary to the pet owners, those who don’t raise pets applaud the tax. They claim that when the owners’ awareness doesn’t work, a law should show its teeth. Moreover, the tax revenues could be spent on patrols to ensure that pets’ waste is removed and that fierce pets do not pose a threat to walkers. Weighing the ideas from different aspects, I think it is a good choice to levy a tax on pet owners, at least at this moment in China’s big cities. Firstly, pets also consume public resources. The ratio between pets and residents in big cities is disproportionately high. Pet owners should pay for the consumption their pets impose on the public. Secondly, the increased budget revenues could be used to set up a special office, which operates to regulate requirements for pet ownership and registration. In most big cities in China, pet-raising does not need any registration, which is one of the reasons why pet problems have been a disturbing annoyance to urban residents. Finally, the government needs money to build shelters for stray dogs and cats or have them neutered or spayed. This leads to another problem, that is, who are to ensure the fulfillment of these measures. Patrols? Good, but they need to be paid. Therefore, I think it is reasonable to enact a law on pet ownership and registration. But specific questions as to who should be relieved from paying the tax, etc. should be discussed later.
解析
本题讨论是否应该向宠物主人征收年税的话题,命题是社会各界关注的焦点。本题要求简要概括所给材料中的三种观点,并发表自己的看法。在具体的写作过程中,考生可以开篇点明社会现象并提出论点:是否应该向宠物主人收取年税;第二段简要阐述三方观点;第三段重点阐述自己对这一问题的看法并说明理由;最后一段总结全文,重申观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/5ZkMFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Becauseofthegrowthhabitsofbananaplants.B、Becauseofthefertilityofthesoilthere.C、Becauseofthespecificplantin
Althoughthefirstyearisreallyimportantforlanguagedevelopmentinchildren,majorlearningcontinuesthroughoutachild’s
金圣叹说过:“人生三十不仕,不当再仕,五十不娶,不当再娶。何则?用非其时也。”这一种说法,可代表中国人一般的普通思想。中国人的事业观,最羡慕“少年得志”,最伤感“大器晚成”。为了这个原因,便是有所成就的人,到了五十以上,便有退休的意思。六十七十的人若还在事
如果回归自然,各有不同的方式,后人总是尊重前辈的人生最后一次选择。一位朋友偶然讲起一件事,犹如一篇小小说,听者动容。在新开发的丛林里,一条蜿蜒的小径上,一个衣着素色的女子踽踽独行,径直走向林子里的一棵树。这里许多树大小参差不一,不过都长得很快,新生的树叶嫩
听人家背地里谈论,孔乙己原来也读过书,但终于没有进学,又不会营生;于是愈过愈穷,弄到将要讨饭了。幸而写得一笔好字,便替人家抄抄书,换一碗饭吃。可惜他又有一样坏脾气,便是好喝懒做。坐不到几天,便连人和书籍纸张笔砚,一齐失踪。如是几次,叫他抄书的人也没有了。孔
作为中国最早的教育中心和科学研究中心,北京大学聚集了中国优秀的专家学者,不断开拓创新,改造发展,以培养出的高质量人才所做出的高水平科学成果深刻影响和推动着中国高等教育的航程。一百年来,以北京大学为代表的中国现代大学群,在中国走向现代化的历史中起了重要的先锋
有一晚碰到一位认识她的熟人,说起她父亲前两天走了。一时不知说什么,想起那天她说的话,说她父亲走了,她不知如何办。正是夏天,没过几天在水果摊碰到她。她正俯身在摊前挑选葡萄,一串串挑好,放在塑料袋里。她在和摊主说话,除了那袭短袖黑裙透露出一点与丧事有关的消
我母亲虽则并不知书识字,却把她的全副希望放在我的教育上。我是一个早慧的小孩,不满三岁时,就已认了八百多字,都是我父亲每天用红笺方块教我的。我才满三岁零点,便在学堂里念书。我当时是个多病的小孩,没有搀扶,不能跨一个六英寸高的门槛。但我比学堂里所有别的学生都能
要一个人独自进食,即使不算重罚,在中国文化中通常也被视为不幸,一种不无悲凉的境地。汉语对吃独食的描述,大都乏善可陈,一句“胡乱吃了些”搪塞过去。中国人的社会中,人必须借饮食与他人沟通,与社会上的人形成生命共同体之感受。如今,大家庭在解体,晚婚、单
她怎能忍受如此的不幸。
随机试题
肾柱位于
A.心、肝、肾B.心、肝、骨骼肌C.肝、肾、肠D.脂肪组织、骨骼肌E.神经细胞能利用游离脂酸的组织是
一人有限责任公司与个人独资企业的区别不包括()。
A公司建造—幢新厂房,有关资料如下:(1)2011年1月1日向银行专门借款7500万元,期限为3年,年利率为6%,每年1月1日付息。(2)除专门借款外,公司只有—笔—般借款,为A公司于2010年12月1日借入的长期借款5550万元,期限为5年,年利率为
现金流量表的编制基础是()。
小组工作中发展模式的实施原则不包括()。
下列各句中,画线成语使用恰当的是:
婚姻可撤销的情形是()
甲向某电脑公司购买一批电脑送给母校。甲指示电脑公司将电脑交给学校,并将订货情况通知了学校。后电脑公司委托某快递公司将电脑运至学校,运输过程中两台电脑毁坏。下列选项中,正确的是()(2015年非法学基础课单选第32题)
A、TheeffectsoffloodsintheU.S.B、AheavystormsystemstrucktheU.S.C、U.S.stateswerefacingfloodsthreats.D、Tornadoes
最新回复
(
0
)