首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Linguists have understood for decades that language and thought are closely related. Humans construct reality using thought and
Linguists have understood for decades that language and thought are closely related. Humans construct reality using thought and
admin
2011-05-29
50
问题
Linguists have understood for decades that language and thought are closely related. Humans construct reality using thought and express these thoughts through the use of language. Edward Sapir and his student Benjamin Whorl are credited with developing the most relevant explanation outlining the relationship between thought and language, the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. The hypothesis consists of two parts, linguistic relativity and linguistic determinism. Supporters of linguistic relativity assume that culture is shaped by language. Terwilliger defines linguistic determinism as the process by which "the functions of one’s mind are determined by the nature of the language which one speaks." In simpler terms, the thoughts that we construct are based upon the language that we speak and the words that we use. In its strongest sense, linguistic determinism can be interpreted as meaning that language determines thought. In its weakest sense, language partially influences thought. Whorl was careful to avoid authoritative statements which would permanently commit him to particular position.
Because of the broad nature of his statements, it is difficult to distinguish exactly to what extent Whorf believes that language determines thought. Heated debate among modern linguists demonstrates that disagreement exists about the accuracy and correctness of Whorf’s studies and of the actual level of influence of language on thought processes.
The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis essentially consists of two distinct statements connecting the relation of thought and language. Whorf believes that humans may be able to think only about objects, processes, and conditions that have language associated with them. The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis also explains the relationship between different languages (French, English, German, Chinese, and so on) and thought. Whorl demonstrated that culture is largely determined by language. Different cultures perceive the world in different ways. Culturally essential objects, conditions and processes usually are defined by a plethora of words, while things that cultures perceive as unimportant are usually assigned one or two words. Whorf developed this theory while studying the Hopi Indian tribe. Whorl was amazed that the Hopi language has no words for past, present, and future. The Hopi have only one word for flying objects. A dragonfly, an airplane, and a pilot are defined using the same word. Whorl questioned whether or not the Hopi view the world differently than western peoples. After further interpretation and analysis he concluded that the Hopi have a sense for the continuum of time despite having no words to specifically describe past, present, and future.
It is commonly believed that the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis possesses some truth, but the extent to which it is applicable to all situations is questioned. Linguists generally sup port a "strong" or a "weak" interpretation. Linguists who study the hypothesis tend to cite examples that support their beliefs but are unable or unwilling to refute the opposing arguments. Examples exist that strengthen the arguments of everyone who studies the hypothesis. Nobody has gained significant ground in proving or refuting the hypothesis because the definitions of Sapir and Whorl are very vague and incomplete, leaving room for a significant amount of interpretation.
Which of the following criticisms is often made of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis?
选项
A、It has no empirical evidence in its favor.
B、It is formulated on the basis of only one case study.
C、Its applicability has been greatly exaggerated.
D、No convincing examples can be found to support its claim.
答案
C
解析
本题的依据句是第四段第一句的“It is commonly believed that... all situations is questioned.”从中可知,人们普遍认为Sapir-Whorf假设具有,定的真实性,但对该学说能否适用于所有情况提出了质疑,后半句实际上暗指有人对该假设的用途过分夸大提出了批评。因此正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/4O5YFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
•Readtheannualreportaboutacompany.•Choosethebestwordtofillineachgap,fromA,BorC.•Foreachquestion(29-40
Lookatthechartsbelow.Theyshowthestockmarketindexfor8regionsinChinaduringthefirsthalfofJanuary.Whichch
SprintWantsYourIPhoneRememberthemapwarsbetweenAT&TWirelessandVerizonWireless?SprintNextelthoughtitlookedl
Mycorrhizalfungiinfectmoreplantsthandoanyotherfungiandarenecessaryformanyplantstothrive,buttheyhaveescaped
Theyhadplannedtogooutingthisweekend,buttheyfinallyhadto_____itbecauseoftherainyweather.
Becausealcoholisasolvent,itisacomponentofmanyliquidmedicines.
Hurricanesareviolentstormsthatcausemillionsofdollarsinpropertydamageandtakemanylives.Theycanbeextremelydange
JaneandTomhavebeenabletoreconciletheirdifferenceandareahappyfamilyagain.
OneexpertremarksthatacomputerwithsomanytubesasthebrainhasneuronswouldrequiretheEmpireStateBuildingtocontai
Youmust______yourself,ortheywillcontinuetobullyyou,soyouwillgoonlivingindisgrace.
随机试题
关于MRI检查禁忌证的描述,不正确的是
对于类白血病的描述不正确的是
右上后牙于5天前结束金属烤瓷冠治疗,患者持续地对冷热刺激敏感,最可能的原因是
患者眩晕,头痛头胀,头重脚轻,面红目赤,急燥易怒,口苦,舌红苔黄,脉弦数。其证型是
女性,54岁。优秀话务员。近几年怀疑丈夫有外遇,看电视时激动,控制不住,外出走失一周找不到自己的家,住在露天,公安人员收留送回家。吃饭用手抓着吃,记忆力下降,行为幼稚。既往高血压7年,脑梗塞后10个月。神经系统检查:BP225/110mmHg,说话口齿
下列财务管理目标中,考虑了风险因素的有()。
不作为犯罪,是指行为人负有实施某种积极行为的特定的法律义务,并且能够实行而不实行,造成一定的法律后果,从而构成犯罪。简单概括不作为犯罪,即应为、能为、不为。就其法律特征而言则具有隐蔽性、消极性、间接性和违法性等。根据上述定义,下列不构成不作为犯罪
Areyousinglebuttoobusytosearchforlove?Thenyouneedtotrythelatestdatingphenomenonthatissweeping【B1】______the
考生文件夹下存在一个数据库文件“samp3.accdb”,里面已经设计好表对象“tUser”,同时还设计出窗体对象“fEdit”和“fUser”。请在此基础上按照以下要求补充“fEdit”窗体的设计:(1)将窗体中名称为“lRemark”的标签控件上的文
Excusesrepresentadesiretohangontothelifeyouhavenow.Anexcuseisanobstaclethatyouchoosetoplace【C1】______front
最新回复
(
0
)