2. 考研
  3. Laws of nature are of two basic forms: 1) a law is Universal if it states that some conditions, so far as are known, in-variably

Laws of nature are of two basic forms: 1) a law is Universal if it states that some conditions, so far as are known, in-variably

admin2010-02-22  16
问题     Laws of nature are of two basic forms: 1) a law is Universal if it states that some conditions, so far as are known, in-variably are found together with certain other conditions; and 2) a law is probabilistic if it affirms that, on the average, a stated fraction of cases displaying a given condition will display a certain other condition as well. In either case, a law may be valid even though it obtains only under special circumstances or as a convenient approximation.
    (46)Moreover, a law of nature has no logical necessity; rather, it rests directly or indirectly upon the evidence of experience. Laws of universal form must be distinguished from generalizations, such as "All chairs in this office are gray," which appear to be accidental. Generalizations, for example, cannot support counterfactual conditional statements such as "If this chair had been in my office, it would be gray" nor subjunctive conditionals such as "If this chair were put in my office, it would be gray." On the other hand, the statement "All planetary objects move in nearly elliptical paths about their star" does provide this support. All scientific laws appear to give similar results. (47)The class of universal statements that can be candidates for the status of laws, however, is determined at any time in history, by the theories of science current then.
    Several positive attributes are commonly required of a natural law. Statements about things or events limited to one location or one date cannot be lawlike. Also, most scientists hold that the predicate must apply to evidence not used in deft-ring the law: though the law is founded upon experience, it must predict or help one to understand matters not included among these experiences. Finally, it is normally expected that o law will be explainable by more embracing laws or by some theory.
    (48)Thus t a regularity for which there are general theoretical grounds for expecting it will be more readily called a natural law than an empirical regularity that cannot be subsumed under more general laws or theories.
    Universal laws are of several types. (49)Many assert a dependence between varying quantities measuring certain properties, as in the law that the pressure of a gas under steady temperature is inversely proportional to its volume.
    Others state that events occur in an invariant order, as in "Vertebrates always occur in the fossil record after the rise of invertebrates." Lastly, there are laws affirming that if an object is of a stated sort it will have certain observable properties. (50)Part of the reason for the ambiguity of the term law of nature lies in the temptation to apply the term only to statements of one of these sorts of laws, as in the claim that science deals solely with cause and effect relationships, when in fact all three kinds are equally valid.

选项
答案因此，与一条不能被归入更背遍的法则或理论而是基于经验的规律相比，一条具有普遍的理论依据支持的规律很可能被认可为一条自然法则。
解析 并列复合句的翻译。本题是一个表比较的句子，难点在于弄清比较的两个对象：一个是由定语从句for which there are general theoretical grounds for expecting it修饰的regularity，另一个是由定语从句that cannot be subsumed under more general laws or theories修饰的empirical regularity。另外，注意两个生词：empirical．adj.完全根据经验的，经验主义的；subsume v.包容，包含。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/4HRRFFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)