首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
admin
2015-12-01
4
问题
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it, and see that it is hard and green. You take up another one, and that, too, is hard, green, and sour. The shopman offers you a third; but, before biting it, you examine it, and find that it is hard and green, and you immediately say that you will not have it, as it must be sour, like those that you have already tried.
Nothing can be more simple than that, you think; but if you will take the trouble to analyze and trace out into its logical elements what has been done by the mind, you will be greatly surprised. In the first place you have performed the operation of induction. You find that, in two experiences, hardness and greenness in apples went together with sourness. It was so in the first case, and it was confirmed by the second. True, it is a very small basis, but still it is enough from which to make an induction; you generalize the facts, and you expect to find sourness in apples where you get hardness and greenness. You found upon that a general law, that all hard and green apples are sour; and that, so far as it goes, is a perfect induction. Well, having got your natural law in this way, when you are offered another apple which you find it hard and green, you say, "all hard and green apples are sour; this apple is hard and green; therefore, this apple is sour." That train of reasoning is what logicians call a syllogism, and has all its various parts and terms — its major premises, its minor premises, and its conclusion. And by the help of further reasoning, which, if drawn out, would have to be exhibited in two or three other syllogisms, you arrive at your final determination, "I will not have that apple. " So that, you see, you have, in the first place, established a law by induction, and upon that you have founded a deduction, and reasoned out the special particular case.
Well now, suppose, having got your conclusion of the law, that at some times afterwards, you are discussing the qualities of apple with a friend; you will say to him, "It is a very curious thing, but I find that all hard and green apples are sour!" Your friend says to you, "But how do you know that?" You at once reply, "Oh, because I have tried them over and over again, and have always found them to be so." Well, if we are talking science instead of common sense, we should call that an experimental verification. And, if still opposed, you go further, and say, "I have heard from people, in Somerset shire and Devon shire, where a large number of apples are grown, and in London, where many apples are sold and eaten, that they have observed the same thing." It is also found to be the case in Normandy, and in North America. In short, I find it to be the universal experience of mankind wherever attention has been directed to the subject. Whereupon, your friend, unless he is a very unreasonable man, agrees with you, and is convinced that you are quite right in the conclusion you have drawn. He believes, although perhaps he does not know he believes it, that the more extensive verifications have been made, and results of the same kind arrived at—that the more varied the conditions under which the same results are attained, the more certain is the ultimate conclusion, and he disputes the question no further. He sees that the experiment has been tried under all sorts of conditions, as to time, place, and people, with the same result; and he says with you, therefore, that the law you have laid down must be a good one, and he must believe it.
The term "natural law " as it appears in the text refers to______.
选项
A、common sense
B、the result of an induction
C、the order of nature
D、a scientific discovery
答案
B
解析
本题可参照第2段中间的一句话Well,having got your natural law in this way,when…。而这一句前面有这样一句话:True,it is a very small basis,but still it is enough fromwhich to make an induction.从中可知B项为正确答案,即the result of an induction。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/3FJYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Ayearagothefirmhada______lossof4.3milliondollarsor20centsashareafterallnecessarydeduction.
Smallbusinessownersmustaccepttheburdensofentrepreneurship.Beinginbusinessforyour-selfrequiresyourfullattention
Smallbusinessownersmustaccepttheburdensofentrepreneurship.Beinginbusinessforyour-selfrequiresyourfullattention
Aninvisibleborderdividesthosearguingforcomputersintheclassroomonthebehalfofstudents’careerprospectsandthosea
TheAleuts,residingonseveralislandsoftheAleutianChain,thePribilofIslands,andtheAlaskanpeninsulahavepossesseda
Inaperfectlyfreeandopenmarketeconomy,thetypeofemployer—governmentorprivate--shouldhavelittleornoimpactonthe
Eversincethe1750s,whenthewriter,satirist,statesmanandinventorBenjaminFranklinputpoliticalcartooningonthemapby
Ofalltheelementsintheadvertisingmix,creativityistheleastquantifiable,yetithaspotentiallythegreatestleverageo
ThechangesingloballyaveragedtemperaturethathaveoccurredattheEarth’ssurfaceoverthepastcenturyaresimilarinsize
Legally,thetermrefersto"anysubstance,with(A)intendeduse,whichresultsormayreasonablybeexpectedtoresult—directly
随机试题
设计基准就是根据不同的产品类型的特点及在使用中的具体要求,选定的一些基准,以确定其他有关的点、线、面。
PowerPoint2010是()家族中的一员。
铁饱和度为
A.门冬酰胺酶B.博莱毒素C.多柔比星D.格拉司琼E.伊立替康能够引起皮肤毒副反应的抗肿瘤药物为()。
银量法测定苯巴比妥含量的依据是紫外分光光度法测定硫喷妥钠含量的根据是
下列各选项,属于元朝立法指导思想的是
所有免试进入北京大学攻读硕士学位的本科生,都已经获得所在学校的推荐资格。以下哪项的意思和以上断言完全一样?
Agingbabyboomersaredeterminedtofighttheagingprocess.Theyspendmillionsofdollarsayearon【C1】______theyperceiveas
—ReadthearticleontheoppositepageaboutthemarketingguruTheodoreLeavitt.—Choosethebestsentencefrombelow[ofill
Whenaconsumerfindsthatanitemsheorheboughtisfaultyorinsomeotherwaydoesnotliveuptothemanufacturer’sclaim
最新回复
(
0
)