2. 考研
  3. A curious phenomenon occurs during every economic crisis—the rich whine that they are the ones who are suffering most. In curren

A curious phenomenon occurs during every economic crisis—the rich whine that they are the ones who are suffering most. In curren

admin2014-09-05  28
问题     A curious phenomenon occurs during every economic crisis—the rich whine that they are the ones who are suffering most. In current context, the wealthy even demands more tax cuts and more cuts in spending for programs aiding the poor, as every Republican presidential candidate promises.
    I first noticed this woe-is-me attitude among the rich in 1974 when Alan Greenspan had just been named chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. One of his first tasks was to address a conference with emphasis on cutting programs to aid the poor, which brought demonstrators to the event. In an effort to show that everyone was suffering from inflation, Mr. Greenspan said, " If you really wanted to examine percentage-wise who was hurt the most on their income, it was Wall Street brokers. "
    The urge to find ways to pity the well-off is still alive and well. Last week, Bloomberg News reported that declining bonuses are creating severe hardship for many in the top 1 percent of income distribution. One of them, Andrew Schiff, complained that his $350,000 salary barely covers his expenses. Others lamented that they could no longer go to Aspen to ski and must buy discount salmon.
    I have to admit that everyone’s suffering is subjective. But there does seem to be a widespread view that the poor don’t suffer as much from economic downturns because they are used to being at the bottom. As Bob Dylan put it, " When you got, nothing, you got nothing to lose. " Those with expectations of staying on top, who have grown used to living the good life, no doubt do suffer meaningfully when those expectations are shattered and they must learn to get by on incomes only five or 10 times the poverty-level income rather than 20 or 30 times.
    Admittedly, there doesn’t yet seem to be much downside for Republican candidates pandering to the rich. For one thing, they all have billionaires and other ultrarich people funding super political action committees for them. But one of these days, the Republican nominee will be chosen and will have to compete in the general election against President Obama. And it is unlikely that the Republican nominee can win with only conservative Republican votes; he will have to reach out to those who don’t necessarily believe that cutting taxes for the rich is the one and only policy that will stimulate growth.
    As a January poll from the Pew Research Center shows, two-thirds of Americans see strong conflict between the rich and the poor, up from 47 percent in 2009. And a number of polls show that Americans support higher tax rates on millionaires by a ratio of 2-to-1 or more. I think the Republican nominee is going to have a hard time responding if all he has to say is the rich need more tax cuts to compensate them for all their suffering during the economic crisis.
The phrase "pandering to" in Paragraph 5 is closest in meaning to______.
选项 A、adjusting to
B、opposing to
C、catering to
D、attaching to
答案C
解析 “pandering to”这个短语出现在文章第五段的第一句话中。作者在上文表明了自己对于富人哭穷这一做法的鲜明态度之后，在文章的最后两段将笔锋一转，抨击了共和党人支持对富人减税的做法。作者认为，毫无疑问，支持给富人减税能够给共和党人捞到不少好处，他们需要依靠那些亿万富翁来赞助他们各式各样的政治宣传活动。因此这里的pandering to therich意思指共和党人趋炎附势，迎合富人。在四个选项中，只有[C]catering to表示迎合，因此为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/3BMRFFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)