首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2011-02-11
38
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
How does the population survey get it wrong in 2000?
选项
A、The population total in 2000 was reached by different method from that in 1990.
B、There might be some problems with the judgment calls by the researchers.
C、United Jewish Communities offered not enough financial support to the survey.
D、It is the result of the rash of headlines leaving the impression that the population has declined.
答案
B
解析
答案在第二段:judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount.
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/2juYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothereport,thecontestwilllast______days.
SomerecenthistorianshavearguedthatlifeintheBritishcoloniesinAmericafromapproximately1763to1789wasmarkedbyin
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
Theyearwhichprecededmyfather’sdeathmadegreatchangeinmylife.IhadbeenlivinginNewJersey,workingindefenseplan
ItisnothingnewthatEnglishuseisontherisearoundtheworld,especiallyinbusinesscircles.ThisalsohappensinFrance,
DreamFunctionsDreamingisacommonphenomenon.Practicallyallpeopledream,althoughwhethertheycan【1】______themisa
A、AccordingtothemovementandvibrationsofhotgassesB、ThetradewindsblowonEarthC、TheriversD、Thesoundtravelthrough
Inviewoftheobstaclesinlaunchingnewindustriesforwhichaccesstomarketsisacriticallocationfactor,whatkindoffac
随机试题
夹紧工具是用于扩大或撑紧装配件的一种工具。()
患者,女性,66岁。体萤98kg,因急性心肌梗死而急诊入院。入院查体:神志清楚,心率120次/分,律齐。心电图提示前壁广泛性缺血性改变。此时,护士最好给患者安置
某区人民法院以抢劫罪判处王某有期徒刑3年。一审生效后,市人民检察院发现王某的抢劫行为是非常恶劣的,区人民法院判处其3年有期徒刑畸轻,对此案按照审判监督程序进行再审。下列检察院提起抗诉的方法错误的是( )。
每公顷建筑用地上容纳的建筑物的总建筑面积是指()
项目型生产物流的特征不包括()。
苏菜主要由()四种风味组成。
简述希腊化时期教育的变化表现在哪几方面。
(2017年真题)下列关于法治思维的理解,正确的是
信息处理时,下列( )信息处理量相对较小。
A、Theweatheroflastnight.B、Thedesertsintheworld.C、ThecauseofDeathValley.D、Theman’scampinginthedesert.D事实细节题。
最新回复
(
0
)