2. 考研
  3. Sometimes it’s just hard to choose. You’re in a restaurant, and the waiter has his pen at the ready. As you hesitate, he gradual

Sometimes it’s just hard to choose. You’re in a restaurant, and the waiter has his pen at the ready. As you hesitate, he gradual

admin2010-01-13  55
问题    Sometimes it’s just hard to choose. You’re in a restaurant, and the waiter has his pen at the ready. As you hesitate, he gradually begins to take a close interest in the ceiling, his fingernails, then in your dining partner. Each dish on the menu becomes a blur as you roll your eyes up and down in a growing panic. Finally, you desperately opt for something that turns out to be what you hate.
   It seems that we need devices to protect us from our hopelessness at deciding between 57 barely differentiated varieties of stuff-be they TV channels, gourmet coffee, downloadable ring tones, or perhaps, ultimately even interchangeable lovers. This thought is opposed to our government’s philosophy, which suggests that greater choice over railways, electricity suppliers and education will make us happy. In my experience, they do anything but.
   Perhaps the happiest people are those who do not have much choice and aren’t confronted by the misery of endless choice. True, that misery may not be obvious to people who don’t have a variety of luxuries. If you live in Madagascar, say, where average life expectancy is below 40 and they don’t have digital TV or Starbucks, you might not be impressed by the anxiety and perpetual stress our decision - making paralysis causes.
   Choice wasn’t supposed to make people miserable. It was supposed to be the hallmark of self-determination that we so cherish in capitalist western society. But it obviously isn’t: ever more choice increases the feeling of missed opportunities, and this leads to self-blame when choices fail to meet expectations. What is to be done? A new book by an American social scientist, Barry Schwartz, called The Paradox of Choice, suggests that reducing choices can limit anxiety.
   Schwartz offers a self-help guide to good decision making that helps us to limit our choices to a manageable number, and ultimately derive greater satisfaction from the choices we make. This is a capitalist response to a capitalist problem.
   But once you realize that your Schwartzian filters are depriving you of something you might have found enjoyable, you will experience the same anxiety as before, worrying that you made the wrong decision in drawing up your choice-limiting filters. Arguably, we will always be doomed to buyers-remorse and the misery it entails. The problem of choice is perhaps more difficult than Schwartz allows.
From Barry Schwartz’s book, The Paradox of Choice, we can get recommendation tips on______.
选项 A、how to handle the situation of capitalist exploitation
B、how to deal with your expense budget
C、how to avoid the feeling of missed opportunities
D、how to save money by making a right choice
答案C
解析 文中第四段说，选择本来未必一定令人痛苦，它还应该是我们在西方资本主义社会中所珍视的自主抉择的标志。但显然它不是：选择越多，越让人觉得丧失了众多机会，而且多半选择没有达到预期的结果时，又使人自怨白艾。该怎么办?这是提出的要解决的问题，接着就向读者介绍这本书，这本书建议说减少选择可以减少焦虑感，也就是针对上文提出的问题所提出的解决方法。故选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/2hgjFFFM
0

在职申硕（同等学力）英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)