首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2011-02-11
49
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about the National Jewish Population Survey?
选项
A、It found a decline of 300,000 Jews in ten years.
B、It was carried out by United Jewish Communities.
C、This is the first time United Jewish Communities has made mistakes in the population survey.
D、The reported decline is not reliable.
答案
C
解析
作者在第四段介绍了United Jewish Communities这一组织,并说到This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm,
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/1juYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Althoughthedistributionofrecordedmusicwentdigitalwiththeintroductionofthecompactdiscintheearly1980s,technolog
TheobjectiveoftheChartistMovementwasdemocraticrightsforallmen,andittookitsnamefrom"______".
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
TheFamilyThenandNowThingswerenevereasywithinthefamily.Butatatimewhenthefamilywasorientedtowardtheprod
DreamFunctionsDreamingisacommonphenomenon.Practicallyallpeopledream,althoughwhethertheycan【1】______themisa
TheCinemaThefirstmovingpictures,developedinthe1890’s,weredifferentfromwhatweknowaboutcinematoday.Because
A、BecausepeoplewerenotafraidofthatB、BecausetsunamisneverhappensinIndianOceanC、ItwouldcosttoomuchmoneyD、Itwa
A、allofOPEC’s11members,exceptforSaudiArabia,refusedthesuggestionB、allofOPEC’s11members,exceptforSaudiArabia,
Inviewoftheobstaclesinlaunchingnewindustriesforwhichaccesstomarketsisacriticallocationfactor,whatkindoffac
Notsurprisingly,interactionamongpeoplesofdifferentculturesisoftenfilledwithuncertaintiesandevendifficulties.Take
随机试题
特发性血小板减少性紫癜病人出血严重,应选用如下哪些治疗
安置人工心脏起搏器的伤口砂袋压迫的正确时间是()
“医乃仁术”是指
在公布的地段上,同一地块()意向用地者的,市、县人民政府国土资源行政主管部门方可按照本规定采取协议方式出让。
作为财务管理目标,与利润最大化相比,不属于股东财富最大化优点的是()。
经营者持股数额一般以本企业员工平均持股数的()为宜。
某乡镇卫生院在为某产妇接生时,发生大出血,产妇死亡。后经调查发现,接诊医生没有执业医师证书,属于非法行医。那么该乡镇卫生院违反了《医疗机构管理条例》的规定,医疗机构不得使用非卫生技术人员从事的工作为()。
克里斯汀带着8个月大的小孩玩,一只恶狗出现,扑向孩子。克里斯汀弯腰保护孩子,并冲着狗尖叫,然后她注意到她的心砰砰直跳,并出了一身冷汗。请用詹姆斯一兰格理论、坎农一巴德、沙赫特的认识理论解释情绪反应,并对这三种理论进行比较。
[*]
(2010下架构)需求管理是CMM可重复级中的6个关键过程域之一,其主要目标是______。
最新回复
(
0
)