2. 考研
  3. That make arrive A. it is enough from which to (56)______an induction B. you (57)______at your final determination C. you immedi

That make arrive A. it is enough from which to (56)______an induction B. you (57)______at your final determination C. you immedi

admin2014-03-15  33
问题 That make arrive
A. it is enough from which to (56)______an induction
B. you (57)______at your final determination
C. you immediately say (58)______you will not have it
    Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple-you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it, and see that it is hard and green. You take up another one, and that, too, is hard, green, and sour. The shopman offers you a third; but, before biting it, you examine it, and find that it is hard and green, and (59)______, as it must be sour, like those that you have already tried.
    Nothing can be more simple than that, you think; but if you will take the trouble to analyze and trace out into its logical elements what has been done by the mind, you will be gready surprised. In the first place you have performed the operation of induction. You find that, in two experiences, hardness and greenness in apples went together with sourness. It was so in the first case, and it was confirmed by the second. True, it is a very small basis, but still (60)______; you generalize the facts, and you expect to find spumes in apples where you get hardness and greenness. You found upon that a general law, that all hard and green apples are sour; and that, so far as it goes, is a perfect induction. Well, having got your natural law in this way, when you are offered another apple which you find it hard and green, you say, "all hard and green apples are sour; this apple is hard and green; therefore, this apple is sour." That train of reasoning is what logicians call a syllogism, and has all its various parts and terms-its major premises, its minor premises, and its conclusion. And by the help of further reasoning, which, if drawn out, would have to be exhibited in two or three other syllogisms, (61)______, "I will not have that apple." So that, you see, you have, in the first place, established a law by induction, and upon that you have founded a deduction, and reasoned out the special particular case.
选项
答案B
解析 空格前一句的：意思为：这种推理链在逻辑学中叫做三段论法，并有它独特的结构和术语一它的大前提、小前提和结论。空格后一句的意思为：因此你首先通过归纳建立了一条规律，然后在这条规律的基础上进行演绎，推出某个特定情况。故空格所在句的意思应为：那么，通过进一步推理的帮助(如果把这部分推理分开来，大家就会看到它又是两三个三段论推理)，你作出了最终的决定： “我不要那个苹果。”所以，B项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/12OjFFFM
0

在职申硕（同等学力）英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)