首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
admin
2016-03-10
39
问题
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are scattered, tissues rot away and anything left over tends to get destroyed by the elements. Very occasionally, though, these destructive processes get disrupted. This usually happens when the corpse is quickly buried by sediment deposited by a river or blown in by the wind. Then begins a slow process in which minerals precipitate from groundwater into the encased organic material, eventually replacing it with a stony replica: a fossil.
Such was palaeontological doctrine for decades. But in recent years traces of soft tissue, such as blood vessels and bone cells, have been found in some dinosaur fossils. Now researchers have come up with an explanation for how these tissues were preserved for millions of years, which just might make it possible to extract some elements of prehistoric DNA.
That there was more in a fossil than meets the eye emerged in 2005 when Mary Schweitzer, a palaeobiologist at North Carolina State University, found something unusual after her team used acid to dissolve minerals from a fossilised piece of Tyrannosaurus rex bone. Left behind were some fibrous tissue, transparent blood vessels and cells. Many argued that this material must have come from modern bacteria and not a T. rex, since nothing organic could possibly survive the 68m years since the creature had walked the Earth.
In 2012, however, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues revealed the presence of proteins in a dinosaur fossil freshly dug up and carefully protected from any potential contamination. Moreover, one of the proteins the researchers identified could be found only in birds. Since dinosaurs were the ancestors of modern birds, the discovery made it hard to argue that soft-tissue material in the fossil could have come from bacterial contamination. Still, many scientists wondered how such a thing was possible.
In Proceedings of the Royal Society, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues collaborated with a team led by Mark Goodwin, a palaeontologist at the University of California, to seek an explanation. Organic material from dinosaur bones was studied using micro x-ray absorption spectroscopy, which allows scientists to examine the structure of matter using intense light beams. This led Dr. Goodwin to notice something remarkable: the organic material in the samples was thickly laced with iron nanoparticles. In animals, iron is most commonly found in blood and this led the researchers to wonder if the iron had come from blood cells that had once flowed through their dinosaur’s veins. Could it have played a part in the preservation of the tissues?
To test this idea, the researchers designed an experiment using freshly slaughtered ostriches which, being large and flightless birds, seemed to be a reasonable modern equivalent to dinosaurs. They extracted blood vessels from the bones of the birds and soaked them in a haemoglobin solution obtained from ruptured(破裂的)ostrich blood cells for 24 hours. The samples were then placed in both a saline solution and sterile distilled water. As a control, some of the blood vessels were put straight into saline solution or water without being pre-soaked in blood.
As expected, the ostrich tissues that went directly into the water and the saline solution fell apart rapidly and were entirely consumed by bacteria or heavily degraded in just three days. The same thing happened to the tissue soaked in haemoglobin and placed in water. But the treated sample in the saline solution remained intact and has stayed that way for two years now, with no signs of bacterial growth.
Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin believe that highly reactive ions known as free radicals, which are produced by iron as it is released from the haemoglobin, interact with the organic tissue causing abnormal chemical bonds to form. These bonds effectively tie proteins in knots at the molecular level, much as the preservative formaldehyde does. This knot-tying makes the proteins unrecognizable to the sorts of bacteria that would normally consume them. This, they theorise, is how the soft tissues manage to survive for millions of years without rotting away.
The iron nanoparticles, however, may be doing more than just preserving tissues. Despite what happens in the science fiction world of " Jurassic Park" , no dinosaur DNA has yet been found. The reason for this is that DNA is thought to have a half-life of 521 years, which means that, after that much time, half of the bonds between the proteins that make up DNA have broken apart: after another 521 years, another half have gone, and so on. This leaves very little behind after hundreds of thousands of years yet alone the 65m years or so that stand between humanity and dinosaurs. Even so, Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin still wondered if the iron-based preservation process might allow DNA to bypass its typical half-life and last a lot longer.
To find that out, the team used an iron-removal compound known as pyridoxal isonicotinic hydrazide and added four different stains that react only with either DNA itself, or with proteins closely associated with it in organisms other than microbes(微生物). Remarkably, in all cases, these specific stains lit up inside the ancient cells in the tissue samples. This hints that something chemically very similar to DNA can remain in a fossil and might yet be hidden precisely where it had resided during life.
We can infer from the last two paragraphs that______.
选项
A、dinosaurs’ DNA was not replicated in the fiction world of "Jurassic Park"
B、DNA disappears in about 1,000 years and can’t be found in fossils
C、iron nanoparticles can help the DNA to last longer than 521 years
D、iron might play a critical role in keeping DNA in the animal fossils
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干定位至最后两段。第九段第一句提到,纳米铁粒子不仅能在保存动物组织上发挥作用,而且还可能会发挥更多的作用。第十段提到研究人员做了初步实验并有结果显示铁元素在保存动物组织中有重要作用,故答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/05FYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Despitethefactthattodayvirusesareknowntocausecancerinanimalsandincertainplants,whereexistsagreatreluctance
InthefirstepisodeofSixFeetUnder,apopularAmericantelevisionshowairedearlierthisdecade,alargecorporationtries
Whenmostanimalsdie,naturelikestotidyupbymakingtheirbodiesdisappear.Theremainsgeteatenbyscavengers,bonesare
Accordingtotheinterviewee,whatistheproblemofthepresentscienceeducation?
TheAmericanDream:MythorReality?Thoughtheterm"AmericanDream"iswidelyusedtoday,thereexistmanyproblemswese
TheAmericanDream:MythorReality?Thoughtheterm"AmericanDream"iswidelyusedtoday,thereexistmanyproblemswese
Makingyourwaygloomilytotheairportafteranaction-packedholiday,itiseasytofeelthedayshaveflownbyalltooquick.
Makingyourwaygloomilytotheairportafteranaction-packedholiday,itiseasytofeelthedayshaveflownbyalltooquick.
Makingyourwaygloomilytotheairportafteranaction-packedholiday,itiseasytofeelthedayshaveflownbyalltooquick.
Makingyourwaygloomilytotheairportafteranaction-packedholiday,itiseasytofeelthedayshaveflownbyalltooquick.
随机试题
某公司员工都具有理财观念。有些购买基金的员工买了股票,凡是购买地方债券的员工都买了国债,但所有购买股票的员工都不买国债。根据以上前提。以下哪选项一定为真?
甲公司适用的所得税税率为25%,2015年度按照税法规定计算的应交所得税为1000万元。期末,通过比较资产、负债的账面价值与其计税基础,确定应纳税暂时性差异为600万元,可抵扣暂时性差异400万元,上述暂时性差异均与直接计入所有者权益的交易或事项无关。甲公
在下列经济指标中,不仅能够有效评价不同企业的成本水平,而且能综合反映企业全部产品成本水平及其节约、超支程度的指标是()
属于鉴证业务关系人的有()。
可寄生于猫体内的线虫是
对于尿糖检测阳性可能会是
中国公民王林就职于国内某会计师事务所,本年除薪金收入外,其他收入情况如下:(1)1月将新购1套公寓住房出租,租期半年,收取租金3000元。7月将该套公寓以市场价出售,扣除购房成本及相关交易税费后所得50000元。(2)为某报社财经专栏撰稿,稿件以连载形
在()中,任何人都不可能通过对公开或内幕信息的分析来获取超额收益。
作为我国行政事业单位国有资产管理的重要法规文件,()的颁布,标志着我国行政事业单位国有资产管理工作迈上了新的台阶。
小张夫妇因夫妻关系紧张向社会工作者小李求助。小李与他们面谈后发现,小张夫妇因工作早出晚归,孩子放学后没人管,两人经常指责对方不负责任。因此,小李向他们建议,孩子放学后可以到社区的青少年中心接受托管服务。根据上述内容,小李除了扮演服务提供者的角色外,还扮演了
最新回复
(
0
)