首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTS OF FOOD PROMOTION TO CHILDREN This review was commissioned by the Food Standards Agency to ex
REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTS OF FOOD PROMOTION TO CHILDREN This review was commissioned by the Food Standards Agency to ex
admin
2018-09-11
50
问题
REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTS
OF FOOD PROMOTION TO CHILDREN
This review was commissioned by the Food Standards Agency to examine the current research evidence on:
the extent and nature of food promotion to children
the effect, if any, that this promotion has on their food knowledge, preferences and behaviour.
A Children’s food promotion is dominated by television advertising, and the great majority of this promotes the so-called ’Big Four’ of pre-sugared breakfast cereals, soft-drinks, confectionary and savoury snacks. In the last ten years advertising for fast food outlets has rapidly increased. There is some evidence that the dominance of television has recently begun to wane. The importance of strong, global branding reinforces a need for multi-faceted communications combining television with merchandising, tie-ins’ and point of sale activity. The advertised diet contrasts sharply with that recommended by public health advisors, and themes of fun and fantasy or taste, rather than health and nutrition, are used to promote it to children. Meanwhile, the recommended diet gets little promotional support.
B There is plenty of evidence that children notice and enjoy food promotion. However, establishing whether this actually influences them is a complex problem. The review tackled it by looking at studies that had examined possible effects on what children know about food, their food preferences, their actual food behaviour(both buying and eating), and their health outcomes(eg. obesity or cholesterol levels). The majority of studies examined food advertising, but a few examined other forms of food promotion. In terms of nutritional knowledge, food advertising seems to have little influence on children’s general perceptions of what constitutes a healthy diet, but, in certain contexts, it does have an effect on more specific types of nutritional knowledge. For example, seeing soft drink and cereal adverts reduced primary aged children’s ability to determine correctly whether or not certain products contained real fruit.
C The review also found evidence that food promotion influences children’s food preferences and their purchase behaviour. A study of primary school children, for instance, found that exposure to advertising influenced which foods they claimed to like; and another showed that labelling and signage on a vending machine had an effect on what was bought by secondary school pupils. A number of studies have also shown that food advertising can influence what children eat. One, for example, showed that advertising influenced a primary class’s choice of daily snack at playtime.
D The next step, of trying to establish whether or not a link exists between food promotion and diet or obesity, is extremely difficult as it requires research to be done in real world settings. A number of studies have attempted this by using amount of television viewing as a proxy for exposure to television advertising. They have established a clear link between television viewing and diet, obesity, and cholesterol levels. It is impossible to say, however, whether this effect is caused by the advertising, the sedentary nature of television viewing or snacking that might take place whilst viewing. One study resolved this problem by taking a detailed diary of children’s viewing habits. This showed that the more food adverts they saw, the more snacks and calories they consumed.
E Thus the literature does suggest food promotion is influencing children’s diet in a number of ways. This does not amount to proof; as noted above with this kind of research, incontrovertible proof simply isn’t attainable. Nor do all studies point to this conclusion; several have not found an effect. In addition, very few studies have attempted to measure how strong these effects are relative to other factors influencing children’s food choices. Nonetheless, many studies have found clear effects and they have used sophisticated methodologies that make it possible to determine that i)these effects are not just due to chance; ii)they are independent of other factors that may influence diet, such as parents’ eating habits or attitudes; and iii)they occur at a brand and category level.
F Furthermore, two factors suggest that these findings actually downplay the effect that food promotion has on children. First, the literature focuses principally on television advertising; the cumulative effect of this combined with other forms of promotion and marketing is likely to be significantly greater. Second, the studies have looked at direct effects on individual children, and understate indirect influences. For example, promotion for fast food outlets may not only influence the child, but also encourage parents to take them for meals and reinforce the idea that this is a normal and desirable behaviour.
G This does not amount to proof of an effect, but in our view does provide sufficient evidence to conclude that an effect exists. The debate should now shift to what action is needed, and specifically to how the power of commercial marketing can be used to bring about improvements in young people’s eating.
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 on the following pages.
Questions 1-7
Reading Passage 1 has seven paragraphs, A-G.
Choose the most suitable heading for paragraphs A-G from the list of headings below.
Write the appropriate number, i-x, in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.
List of Headings
i General points of agreements and disagreements of researchers
ii How much children really know about food
iii Need to take action
iv Advertising effects of the "Big Four"
v Connection of advertising and children’s weight problems
vi Evidence that advertising affects what children buy to eat
vii How parents influence children’s eating habits
viii Advertising’s focus on unhealthy options
ix Children often buy what they want
x Underestimating the effects advertising has on children
Paragraph D
选项
答案
v
解析
段落中“…establish whether or not a link exists between food promotionand diet or obesity…”和后面反复提及的看电视、肥胖和儿童饮食之间的关系对应标题v.Connection of advertising and children’s weight problems,其他标题都未提及相关内容,所以正确答案为标题v。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/z0EYFFFM
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Britishpoliticalscientistsoncehaddifficultyunderstandinghowtheunbalancingeffectsofaffordinggreaterrepresentationt
Researchershavenotedthatantsarrangetheirdeadusingthesameprinciplesthoughttoproducethemarkingsonanimals
Whiletheambitiontodrawanimmediateconclusionis______,itisnotnecessarilycorrect,forthesearchforthetruthdepends
Relativismamountstothedenialofanobjectiveworldaboutwhichtrueandfalsestatementscanbemade;thereisnoabs
MEETING:MINUTES::
Sendingarobotintospacetogatherinformationiscertainlyaviableoption,Linebutshouldberegardedonlyasthat--anopt
Sendingarobotintospacetogatherinformationiscertainlyaviableoption,Linebutshouldberegardedonlyasthat--anopt
Sendingarobotintospacetogatherinformationiscertainlyaviableoption,Linebutshouldberegardedonlyasthat--anopt
Perry’scriticsinthescientificworld______thatmanyoftheobservationshehasmadeduringmorethanadecadeofresearchi
AstheworksofdozensofwomenwritershavebeenrescuedfromwhatE.P.Thompsoncalls"theenormouscondescensiono
随机试题
患者,男性,55岁。间断上腹疼痛3年。胃镜示胃小弯有一直径2cm的溃疡,活检未见癌细胞。使用H2受体阻滞剂治疗6个月溃疡仍未愈合。此时正确的治疗措施是
患者,男性,68岁。诊断冠心病5年。护士对该患者饮食指导应为
A.INH+RFP,疗程6个月B.强化阶段INH+RFP+PZA-SM,总疗程1年C.INH每日总量不超过0.3g,总疗程6个月D.INH+RFP+PZA,疗程3个月E.强化阶段INH+RFP加或不加PZA,总疗程6~9个月原发性肺结核应采取的
A.伤寒病人B.伤寒带菌者C.急性菌痢D.慢性菌痢E.病毒性肝炎
下列情形中,不可以采取借款人自主支付的是()。
在贷款审批中,不属于贷款审批人应审查内容的是()。
三级物业服务企业的最低注册资本金额为人民币()万元。
行为人因不能抗拒的原因而引起损害结果的,不是犯罪,这是由于行为人()。
人民政协是具有中国特色的制度安排,是社会主义协商民主的重要渠道和专门协商机构。人民政协工作围绕的两大主题是
用变量代换x=cost(0<t<π)化简微分方程(1一x2)y’’一xy’+y=0,并求其满足y|x=0=1,y’|x=0=2的特解。
最新回复
(
0
)