首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say so
admin
2013-01-05
41
问题
Unless we spend money to spot and prevent asteroids (小行星) now, one might crash into Earth and destroy life as we know it, say some scientists.
Asteroids are bigger versions of the meteoroids (流星) that race across the night sky. Most orbit the sun far from Earth and don’t threaten us. But there are also thousands of asteroids whose orbits put them on a collision course with Earth.
Buy $ 50 million worth of new telescopes right now. Then spend $ 10 million a year for the next 25 years to locate most of the space rocks. By the time we spot a fatal one, the scientists say, we’ll have a way to change its course.
Some scientists favor pushing asteroids off course with nuclear weapons. But the cost wouldn’t be cheap.
Is it worth it? Two things experts consider when judging any risk are: 1) How likely the event is; and 2) How bad the consequences are if the event occurs. Experts think an asteroid big enough to destroy lots of life might strike Earth once every 500, 000 years. Sounds pretty rare—but if one did fall, it would be the end of the world. "If we don’t take care of these big asteroids, they’ll take care of us," says one scientist. "It’s that simple. "
The cure, though, might be worse than the disease. Do we really want fleets of nuclear weapons sitting around on Earth? "The world has less to fear from doomsday (毁灭 性的) rocks than from a great nuclear fleet set against them," said a New York Times article. (272 words)
What do people think of the suggestion of using nuclear weapons to alter the courses of asteroids?
选项
A、It sounds practical but it may not solve the problem.
B、It may create more problems than it might solve.
C、It is a waste of money because a collision of asteroids with Earth is very unlikely.
D、Further research should be done before it is proved applicable.
答案
B
解析
本题属于推理题。依据是文中的最后一段的内容:“The cure,though,might be worse than the disease.”(治疗方法可能比疾病本身还糟糕。)“the cure”暗指用核武器来改变小行星轨道的办法,“the disease”则指的是小行星可能会与地球相撞的危机。后文进一步指出全世界更害怕的是大量的核武器舰队,而不是毁灭性的星体。所以B是对的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/xAbUFFFM
本试题收录于:
艺术硕士(艺术基础)题库专业硕士分类
0
艺术硕士(艺术基础)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Toomanyvulnerablechild-freeadultsarebeingruthlessly(无情的)manipulatedintoparenthoodbytheirparents,whothinkthatha
Toomanyvulnerablechild-freeadultsarebeingruthlessly(无情的)manipulatedintoparenthoodbytheirparents,whothinkthatha
In1985whenaJapanAirLines(JAL)jetcrashed,itspresident,YasumotoTakagi,calledeachvictim’sfamilytoapologize,and
It’snosecretthatmanychildrenwouldbehealthierandhappierwithadoptiveparentsthanwiththeparentsthatnaturedealtt
It’snosecretthatmanychildrenwouldbehealthierandhappierwithadoptiveparentsthanwiththeparentsthatnaturedealtt
Whatmightdrivingonanautomatedhighwaybelike?Theanswerdependsonwhatkindofsystemisultimatelyadopted.Twodistinc
Longafterthe1998WorldCupwaswon,disappointedfanswerestillcursingthedisputedrefereeing(裁判)decisionsthatdeniedv
Dogsaresocialanimalsandwithoutpropertraining,theywillbehavelikewildanimals.Theywillspoilyourhouse,destroyyou
Unlesswespendmoneytospotandpreventasteroids(小行星)now,onemightcrashintoEarthanddestroylifeasweknowit,sayso
随机试题
可能引起前庭反应的药物是
人眼视觉的模糊阈值是
新生儿,15天,生后母乳喂养。母乳充足,易溢乳,合理的处理方法是
不属于短效口服避孕药禁忌证的是
关于民事法律关系,下列哪一选项是正确的?
每段长度相等的直角折杆在图4-41所示的平面内绕O轴转动,角速度讷顺时针转向,M点的速度方向应是图中的()。
(用户名:21;账套:501;操作日期:2012年1月31日)输入收款单据。2012年1月12日,销售部收到甲公司一张面值10000元的银行汇票,为采购原材料货款。
进口商品需对外索赔出证的,货主或其代理人应在索赔有效期前不少于()天向到货口岸或货物到达地的检验检疫机构申请检验。
A会计师事务所连续多年负责审计X公司财务报表。2017年12月X公司董事会决议变更会计师事务所,改由B会计师事务所负责审计2017年财务报表。接受委托后,B会计师事务所在征得X公司同意的情况下查阅A会计师事务所的审计工作底稿A会计师事务所在决定向B会计师事
关于“决议”,下列说法不正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)