首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
admin
2015-01-10
58
问题
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins were fat, and corporate profits as a percentage of GDP were at an all-time high. Almost half a century later, some things look much the same: big American companies have had a hell of a year, with the stock market soaring, margins strong, and profits hitting a new all-time high. But there’s one very noticeable difference. In 1965, CEOs at big companies earned on average about 20 times as much as their typical employee. These days, CEOs earn about 270 times as much.
That huge gap between the top and the middle is the result of a boom in executive compensation, which rose 876 per cent between 1978 and 2011. In response, we’ve had a host of regulatory reforms designed to curb executive pay. The latest of these is a rule, unveiled by the SEC last month, requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of the median worker. The idea is that, once the disparity is made public, companies will be less likely to award outsized pay packages.
Faith in disclosure has been crucial to the regulation of executive pay since the 1930s. More recently, rules have made companies detail the size and the structure of compensation packages and have enforced transparency about the kinds of comparisons they rely on to determine salaries. The result is that shareholders today know far more about CEO compensation than ever before. There’s only one problem: even as companies are disclosing more and more, executive pay keeps going up and up.
This isn’ t a coincidence: the drive for transparency has actually helped fuel the spiralling salaries. For one thing, it gives executives a good idea of how much they can get away with asking for. A more crucial reason, though, has to do with the way boards of directors set salaries. As Charles Elson and Craig Ferrere write, boards at most companies use what’ s called " peer benchmarking. " They look at the CEO salaries at peer-group firms, and then peg their CEO’s pay to the 50th, 75th, or 90th percentile of the peer group—never lower. This leads to the so-called Lake Wobegon effect: every CEO gets treated as above average. "Relying on peer-group comparisons, the way boards do, mathematically guarantees that pay is going to go up," Elson told me.
On top of this, peer-group comparisons aren’ t always honest: boards can be too cozy with CEOs and may tweak the comparisons to justify overpaying. A recent study shows that boards tend to include as peers companies that are bigger than they are and that pay CEOs more. The system is skewed by so-called "leapfroggers," the few CEOs in a given year who, whether by innate brilliance or by dumb luck, end up earning astronomical salaries. Those big paydays reset the baseline expectations for everyone else.
This isn’t just an American problem. Nor is it primarily a case of boards being helplessly in thrall to a company’ s executives. Boards are far more independent of management than they used to be, and it’s notable that a CEO hired from outside a company—typically gets 20 to 25 per cent more than an inside candidate. The real issues are subtler, though no less insidious. Some boards remain convinced of what Elson calls "superstar theory": they think that CEOs can work their magic anywhere, and must be overpaid to stay. In addition, Elson said, "if you pay below average, it makes it look as if you’d hired a below-average CEO, and what board wants that?"
Transparent pricing has perverse effects in other fields. In a host of recent cases, public disclosure of the prices that hospitals charge for various procedures has ended up driving prices up rather than down. And the psychological causes in both situations seem similar. We tend to be uneasy about bargaining in situations where the stakes are very high: do you want the guy doing your neurosurgery, or running your company, to be offering discounts? Better, in the event that something goes wrong, to be able to tell yourself that you spent all you could. And overspending is always easier when you’ re spending someone else’ s money. Corporate board members are disbursing shareholder funds; most patients have insurance to foot the bill.
Sunlight is supposed to be the best disinfectant. But there’ s something naive about the new SEC rule, which presumes that full disclosure will embarrass companies enough to restrain executive pay. As Elson told me, "People who can ask to be paid a hundred million dollars are beyond embarrassment. " More important, as long as the system for setting pay is broken, more disclosure makes things worse instead of better. We don’t need more information. We need boards of directors to step up and set pay themselves, instead of outsourcing the job to their peers. The rest of us don’ t get to live in Lake Wobegon. CEOs shouldn’t, either.
According to the passage, the rapid increase in executive compensation______.
选项
A、is solidly based on their contribution to companies’ development
B、leads to the huge disparity between the top and the middle in income
C、should be immediately stopped under regulatory reforms
D、will play a more important role in promoting company’s profit margins
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/waCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Givingthechildproblemshecannotsolvewillonlyfrustratehim.
Theschoolisgoingthe________miletocreatethenextgenerationofsportingstarsthankstoitsuniquedevelopmentprogram.
Mutualfundsarethusbestforinvestorswhodon’twanttotakethetimetostudystocksindetailorwho________theresourcest
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
A、Solarenergy.B、Fossilfuels.C、Newnuclearplants.D、Nonuclearplants.C根据原文第二段,核问题涉及能源安全和气候变化的问题。前者反对关闭核电站,并且支持开新型核电站,因为废除核
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939andhaspublishedmorethan40poems.
A、Itiscausingchangesincurrentsandspeciesinthearea.B、ThemostsouthernpartoftheLarseniceshelfhasbrokenuptoo.
A、US$1.75billion.B、US$1.25billion.C、US$0.6billion.D、US$0.5billion.C根据题干关键词正确定位原文相关信息,并对数字做简单换算。
上海是一座朝气蓬勃、充满活力、多姿多彩的国际大都市,改革开放以来,上海变化之大令世人瞩目。经济高速发展,社会秩序稳定,人民安居乐业,呈现出一片繁华气象。今天,尽管上海还有着不少色彩斑斓的过去可以留恋和回味,但城市日新月异的面貌却使越来越多的世人折服。浦西
Aboutthreehundredyearsago,therewereapproximatelyhalfabillionpeopleintheworld.Inthetwocenturiesthatfollowedt
随机试题
ThePositiveEffectsofOwningaDogonChildrenDogsarethebestfriendofchildren.Thedogandthechildteacheachothe
以下行为可以视为重婚罪的是()
A、年轻恒牙早期急性牙髓炎B、年轻恒牙牙髓充血C、年轻恒牙晚期牙髓炎D、乳牙牙髓坏死E、年轻恒牙根尖周病下列治疗适用于活髓切断术
A.内庭B.中脘C.神阙D.太冲E.脾俞、太白
浅埋暗挖法的工艺流程和技术要求,主要是针对()而形成的。
()是有一定人数参加,行为没有法定依据,对企业的生产经营及社会秩序产生一定影响的事件。
下列命题中属于客观唯心主义的是()。
当前和今后一个时期,国际局势发展的基本态势是()
设f(x)在x=1处一阶连续可导,且f′(1)=-2,则________.
Peoplewantactiononnoise,arecentpublicmeetinginBrisbaneshowed.Somewanttechnicalimprovementssuchasquieterairco
最新回复
(
0
)