首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re
admin
2013-10-17
30
问题
How to Reinvent College Rankings: Show the Data Students Need Most
All rankings are misleading and biased(有偏见的). But they’re also the only way to pick a school. I’ve heard those exact words dozens of times and inferred their sentiment hundreds more. They undoubtedly were a major contributing factor in the 250,000 applications to the top colleges this past year. With only 14, 000 chances available, there will be a lot of disappointed families when decisions are announced in a few days. For 30 years, I’ve co-authored bestselling books and provocative articles about how to improve one’s chances of being accepted at a "top" college.
The first edition of our book Getting In ! revealed what went on behind the admission committees’ closed doors, and introduced the concepts of packaging and positioning to the college-application vocabulary. The newest edition adapts the same principles to the digital age. But the core message remains: good colleges are not looking for the well-rounded kid—they’re looking to put together the well-rounded class.
What were revelations in 1983 are common knowledge today—at least among college-bound students, parents, and counselors. They also don’t have to be told that the odds of getting into a "highly selective" school are ridiculously low. Brown and Dartmouth will each accept about 9 percent of applicants; Cornell, Northwestern, and Georgetown about 16 percent. And Harvard, Yale, and Stanford? Forget about it: less than 7 percent!
Wanting to attend a "name" school isn’t illogical. And there is nothing illogical in parents wanting a better return on their investment. A college’s brand value—whether that school’s name will be recognized and open employers’ door.
Colleges, counselors, and parents talk a lot about finding the right "fit" between a school and a student. In reality, the process is dominated by reputation.
The problem is that college reputations have been controlled by rankings. Far too many " highly ranked" colleges are gaming the rankings and trying to attract more and more applicants—when the particular college is actually a poor "fit" for many of the kids applying. Colleges want to attract and reject more kids because that "selectivity" improves the institution’s ranking.
College presidents publicly complain there are too many college rankings. Privately, they admit they have to provide the data that feed that maw(大胃口). They can’t afford to be left off a rankings list.
The real losers in this system are students and their parents. A bad fit is costly, not just in dollars, but in time, energy, and psychological well-being.
The emphasis should be on finding the right fit. But finding the right fit is not easy. Subjective guidebooks like Edward Fiske’s—originally titled The New York Times Selective Guide to Colleges—are very useful and consciously do not include rankings. Ted changed his three-category rating system to make it more difficult to simply add " stars" and rank-list colleges. Even families who can afford to visit lots of colleges and endure the backward-walking tours find that campus personalities soon blur in their memory.
Thus it is not surprising that anxious, busy parents turn to rankings for shorthand comfort. Unfortunately, the data that U. S. News and other media companies are collecting are largely irrelevant. As a result, the rankings they generate are not meaningless, just misleading.
Some examples: U. S. News places a good deal of emphasis on the percentage of faculty who hold a "terminal degree"—typically a Ph. D. Unfortunately, a terminal degree does not correlate(相关的)in any way with whether that professor is a good teacher. It also doesn’t improve that professor’s accessibility to students. In fact, there is usually such a correlation: the more senior the professor, the less time they have for undergraduates.
U. S. News’ second most heavily weighted factor—after a college’s six-year graduation rate—is a peer assessment of colleges by college presidents and admissions deans. You read that right; administrators are asked to evaluate colleges that are competitive with their own school. If not an complete conflict of interest, this measure is highly suspect.
Even some seemingly reasonable "inputs" are often meaningless. U. S. News heavily weights the number of classes with fewer than 20 students. But small classes are like comfort food: it is what high-school kids are familiar with. They have never sat in a large lecture hall with a very interesting speaker. So it is not something they could look forward or value.
While most rankings suffer from major problems in criteria(标准)and inputs, the biggest problem is simpler; all the ranking systems use weightings that reflect the editors’ personal biases. Very simply, some editors’ priorities are undoubtedly going be different from what is important to me. Assuredly, my preferences are different from my kids’. And both will differ markedly from our neighbors’ objectives.
Colleges say they truly want to attract kids for whom the school will be a good fit. To make good on that promise, colleges need to provide families with insight, not just information; and they need to focus on outputs, not just inputs. Collecting and sharing four sets of very different data would be a good start;Better insight into the quality of education a student will get on that campus. Colleges need to share the exam scores for all students applying to medical school, law school, business school, and graduate programs. These tests reflect not just the ability of the kids who’ve gone to that college, but what they’ve learned in the three-plus years they’ve attended.Colleges need to assess a campus’ "happiness" coefficient(系数). A happy campus is a more productive learning environment; and one that has a lower incidence of alcohol and drug abuse.The full debt that families incur(招致); not just student debt.The salaries of graduates one, five, and 10 years after graduation.
A fifth useful metric is what employers—both nationally and regionally—think of graduates from particular colleges. Hiring preferences are a useful proxy(代表)for reputation.
The last piece in enabling families to find a better fit will come from entrepreneurs. Some smart " kid" will develop an online tool that will allow students and parents to take this new college-reported data and assign weighting factors to the characteristics that are important to them. The tool would then generate a customized ranking of colleges that reflects the family’s priorities—not some editor’s.
Colleges may complain about the rankings, but they are complicit(串通一气的)in keeping them. It is reminiscent(怀旧的)of the classic Claude Raines line in Casablanca; "I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" If colleges really want kids for whom their college is a good fit, they will collect and publish the types of honest data that will give families a better basis for smart decisions.
The reputation of colleges can be represented by______, as it shows what employers think of the graduates from the college.
选项
答案
hiring preferences
解析
本题考查什么能代表大学的名誉,因为它也代表了雇主是如何看待这所大学的毕业生的。根据定位句可知,高雇佣率代表了大学的声誉。此处要求填入名词性短语作介词宾语,故hiring preferences为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/wCQFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhatdoNationalSemiconductor,MaxwellHouseCoffee,Deloitte&Touche,andHearstMagazineshaveincommon?Alltheseorganiza
Formorethantwocenturies,America’scollegesanduniversitieshavebeenthebackboneofthecountry’sprogress.Theyhaveedu
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulous(人口多的)countries.ButsinceChinalaunchedafamilyp
Morethan200organizationsarepreparingtobringtheirteamsofrobotstoRoboCup2003nextmonthinPadua,Italy,aneventwh
A、Husbandandwife.B、Salesmanandcustomer.C、Doctorandpatient.D、Employerandemployee.C女士问男士哪里不舒服,男士回答了不舒服的症状,可见这是医生和病人的对话
Credit1.信用对一个人的发展很重要2.现代社会面临信用危机3.如何提高信用度
赵州桥赵州桥坐落在汶河上,距离赵县南部约2.5公里。这座桥是在公元605年至公元616年建造的。赵州桥是由中国著名的匠师李春设计的,是用石头建造的,长50.82米,宽10米,还有一个不可思议的弧形桥洞,高7.23米,跨度为37.35米。桥上的石头
蔡伦根据中国古代的历史资料来看,公元105年,东汉有个名叫蔡伦的太监把新发明的纸进献给和帝。历史学家范哗记录了这个事件,但是在中国西部和西藏考古学的发现表明,纸的发明是在几百年以前。更古老的纸的样品,有的可以追溯到公元前200年,已经在敦煌、于阗
少林功夫少林功夫是河南登封少林寺信奉佛教文化的和尚们练习的一种武术。少林寺,建于北魏太和十九年,是少林功夫发展的文化空间。少林功夫最初是佛教僧侣练习的,他们的职责是保护寺庙。现在经过1500多年的发展,少林功夫已逐步发展成为一种完美技术和丰富含义
随机试题
Thehotel________duringthesummerholidaysisclosetotheseaside.
下列病人不可给予鼻饲饮食的是
石蜡是什么产品生产过程中的副产品
A.Ⅰ类洞B.Ⅱ类洞C.Ⅲ类洞D.Ⅳ类洞E.Ⅴ类洞按G.V.Black分类法右上2腭面龋坏所制备的窝洞类型是
组成专业化工厂的功能单元常分为()。
下列国家机构中,属于国务院直属机构的是()。
下列对第二段中“补课”这一概念的理解,准确的一项是()。对“在现代化进程中,启蒙的任务是不可逾越的”这句话理解正确的一项是()。
强调社会文化因素在个体认知发展中具有重要作用的心理学家是
在双绞线的组网方式中,以太网的中心连接设备是【 】。
子过程Plus完成对当前库中“教师表”的工龄字段都加1的操作。SubPlus()DimcnAsNewADODB.ConnectionDimrsAsNewADODB.RecordsetDimfdAsADODB.FieldDi
最新回复
(
0
)