首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
43
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/vV3GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B20】
Itwasessentialthattheapplicationforms______backbeforethedeadline.
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceconcerninghealthisimportantbecause______.Soundpersonalhealthchoiceisoftendifficultt
You______meyourtelephonenumberincasesomeonewantstocontactyou.
(Thereislittlechance)thatmankindwouldsurviveanuclearwar.
Globalsatellitecommunicationssystemswillbeusefulto______.Whatcanwesayaboutthenewglobalsatellitecommunications
"Imissedthetrainhomelastnight.""So______"
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
I’msureIcan______himintolettingusstayinthehotelforthenight.
随机试题
男性54岁,有高血压6年,近半年常有劳累时心前区闷痛,常规心电图检查3次均无异常,为明确诊断,再进一步检查以下列哪一项最恰当
指出混响产生的条件哪项最准确
一般不需做碘过敏试验的造影是
脑缺血超早期治疗的时间窗为
白术的功效为
关于汇率对一国经济的影响,说法错误的是()。
国有企业之间发生的下列款项中,可以办理托收承付结算的是( )。
请认真阅读给定材料。指出其中存在的4处论证错误,并分别进行简要评述。每条不超过150字,论证错误主要包括论证中的概念不明确、推理不严密等。要说VR是今年国内最受关注的新产业之一,可能没有人会反对。但要是说国内VR产业发展良好,则很少有人认可。从
以下关:PMAC电址的说法中,错误的是()。
规划一个C类网,需要将网络分为9个子网,每个子网最多15台主机,最合适的子网掩码是______。A.255.255.224.0B.255.255.255.224C.255.255.255.240D.没有合适的子网掩码
最新回复
(
0
)