首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2017-09-22
23
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
The controversy at San Jose State University is caused by the professors’______.
选项
A、requirements for the MOOCs
B、expenses on the MOOCs
C、opposition to the MOOCs
D、misuse of the MOOCs
答案
C
解析
见第1段第4句和第5句“The controversy stems from…in its course”,因此选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ucHsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
ReadthisletterfromMs.Lee.KEGAUDIOMAIDSTONKENTME156QPTel:(01622)672261Fax:(01622)750653Mr.YoshiWatenable2-9-9S
Readthefollowingstatement:Onlyunderofficiallawsoradministrativeregulationscanwedefendastableandreliableexa
Readthefollowingjobadvertisementintoday’sDailyTelegraph,YouareAnnJonesandwritealetterabout120wordsofapplica
Youareaskedtowriteacompositioninwhichyougiveyourownopinionsonthefollowingstatement:Trafficandhousingpro
YougotaletterfromJimGreen,apersonworkingatthemarketingdepartmentofacompany.
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
随机试题
承租人与出租人签订一项房屋租赁合同,合同的租赁期限为30年。在合同期限内,发生下列事项:(1)为了美观舒适,承租人未经出租人同意,自己对房屋进行了装修。要求出租人承担50%的修费用。(2)承租人经出租人同意将房屋转租。(3)租赁期间房屋需要维修,承租
某产妇计划剖宫产,青霉素过敏试验阳性,该产妇可以选择预防应用的抗生素是
下列哪种细胞表面不表达MHC-分子
依据我国票据法,下列有关本票与支票的表述中哪些是正确的?
《工程建设项目施工招标投标办法》和《工程建设项目货物招标投标办法》规定了投标保证金一般不得超过投标总价的2%,最高不超过()元人民币。
标准法中,资产管理对应的β系数是()
C
ThreefactorscontributetothemiraculousspreadofEnglish【C1】______aninternationallanguage:Englishusageinscience,tech
A、OK,Iwill.B、Takecare.C、Thankyou.D、Let’sgo.A本题考查对Could引导的提出请求的一般疑问句的回答。对于此类问题的回答分为肯定和否定两种:肯定回答一般为Yes,ofcourse/Certainl
【B1】【B4】
最新回复
(
0
)