首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2019-09-23
29
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection. Modern scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward.
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp
wedges
, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams.
Clams
were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modern clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa. In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths — some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens — clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
According to Gould and Calloway’s theory, the decline of brachiopods______.
选项
A、resulted from their competition with clams
B、seemed to have been caused by an environmental impact
C、were not triggered by a comet crashing down from the heavens
D、might be the consequence of mass deaths in the Permian period
答案
B
解析
推断题。第3段第5句指出当今蛤类比腕足动物多得多的原因似乎是二叠纪时期大规模死亡的结果,选项D待定。第3段最后一句提到了可能会导致大规模死亡的原因,生态变化、地质变化或彗星撞地球,这些都是环境的变化,由此可以排除D选项,确定正确答案B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/tz1YFFFM
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、Issuingstatementsorcommuniqus.B、Callingpressconferences.C、Makingpublicspeeches.D、Callingonthepeopletoparadein
Whatissuggestedforyourinvestment?
WhendidIbeginmygenealogyresearch?
A、正确B、错误A主旨题。原文一开始便提出主题,指出19世纪早期内陆水运系统是北美最流行的长途运输方式,接着以事实为例进行说明。最后进行总结Duringthefirstthirdofthecentury,however,transport
A、正确B、错误B因果关系的找寻和判断。根据原文ItallowedsettlersintheGreatLakesregiontosendtheircropseastwardtoNewYorkCityatthemou
Media’sPositiveandNegativeInfluenceonTeenagersVocabularyandExpressionspermeateglorifystancebrunette
FightingAgainstHungerVocabularyandExpressionsmicronutrientsroadmapdonoragenciessmallholderfoodsecurityp
Ithasbeenarguedthathighratesofeducationareessentialforcountriestobeabletoachievehighlevelsofeconomicgrowth
Inthepastfewyears,I’vetaughtnonfictionwritingtoundergraduatesandgraduatestudentsatHarvard,Yale,andColumbia’sS
Atotalof4.6milliondigitaltelevisionshavebeensold,andthesalesofHDTVsetshavequadrupledsincelastyear.Consumers
随机试题
故宫旧称为________。
患者男,16岁。左小腿上段肿胀疼痛3个月余,夜间痛明显,查体:左胫骨上段肿胀明显,有压痛,可扪及约6cm×7cm质硬包块,固定,X线片显示左胫骨上段虫蚀状溶骨性破坏,骨膜反应明显,可见Codman三角,局部软组织受侵、肿胀。临床诊断考虑为
以下哪项是由负反馈调节的生理过程
严重面磨损引起颞颌关节紊乱病的主要原因是
(2013年)关于加工贸易内销货物完税价格的确定,下列说法正确的有()。
背景说明:你是宏远公司的行政秘书钟苗,下面是行政经理张明需要你完成的几项工作任务。
鲁迅笔下的阿Q,对于自己进监牢并不烦恼,而以为“惟有圈而不圆,却是他‘行状’上的一个污点”。不仅如此,鲁迅用一百多字详尽描写“阿Q立志要画得圆”却未能如愿的过程,其用心又是什么?鲁迅在《阿Q正传》中并没有解答的问题却在杂文中显示了解答的钥匙。鲁迅
目标设置理论
函数f(x)在[0,+∞)上可导,f(0)=1,且满足等式求导数f’(x);
DearMr.Cooper,ThankyouforyourMay18orderoffiveT-200printers.Unfortunately,theT-200hasbeendiscontinuedandisn
最新回复
(
0
)