首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
admin
2015-10-21
40
问题
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished theorist of liberalism was indeed a brilliant talker and feline gossip. Readers of Berlin’s letters will find that same bubbling flow of malice, wit and human insight on the written page.
A first set of letters came out five years ago. To coincide with Berlin’s centenary year—he lived from 1909 to 1997—his literary executor, Henry Hardy, and a team of co-editors have now brought out a second fat volume. The verbal pressure is higher still, for in 1949 Berlin began dictating to a machine.
Biographically the letters take the reader through Berlin’s professional ascent from clever young don to Oxford professor, public educator and transatlantic academic star. They track the consolidation of his social position as an intellectual jewel of the post-war British establishment. Three or four footnotes a page introduce perhaps 1,000 or more politicians, public servants, academics, musicians and socialites whom Berlin knew or talked about. For that alone, his letters are a unique record of a bygone milieu.
Berlin did not write on oath. He ladles praise on correspondents only to dismiss them in letters to others as gorgons or third-raters. During the Suez crisis in 1956 he writes to the wife of the Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden, that her husband has shown "great moral splendour". The next letter, to Berlin’s stepson at Harvard, calls the British action "childish folly". His capsule judgments are sometimes apt, sometimes sneering. He calls Sir Peter Strawson, an eminent contemporary philosopher, provincial. Berlin is sharper still on his own thin-skinned self. He belittles his large philosophical gifts, finds publication an agony and worries to correspondents that his work is rot.
Mr. Hardy says that these letters represent perhaps a fourth of those Berlin wrote in 1946-1960. There are none back to him. So here is Berlin in his own ironical voice, as selected by editors. A reader only of these letters may well ask why Berlin had such grateful pupils and devoted friends. And why was he among the foremost liberal thinkers of the age? A selection of old and new tributes, The Book of Isaiah, also edited by the tireless Mr. Hardy, partly answers both questions.
Thinkers such as John Rawls defended liberal principles with more argument. Among historians of ideas, Quentin Skinner did more to professionalise their discipline. No one had Berlin’s gift for dramatising and personalising abstract ideas.
Berlin kept returning to three core convictions. Freedom from constraint by others(negative liberty)is more urgent or basic, he argued, than freedom to realise your potential(positive liberty). The left distrusted that distinction and the right misappropriated it, while philosophers continue to pick it over. He thought, secondly, that liberalism fails if it cannot validate the universal need to belong.
But perhaps Berlin’s strongest conviction was that the basic commitments—to friendship and truth, fairness and liberty, family and achievement, nation and principle—clash routinely and cannot be smoothly reconciled. Thinkers and politicians should admit the conflicts, Berlin implied, and not blanket them with doctrine or tyrannically attempt to subordinate some concerns to others.
The first two of those ideas crop up here and there in these letters. In personal form, that third conviction—that people are to be taken in full, not in formulae—runs throughout, and was surely one source of Berlin’s charm. More volumes of letters are to follow. Readers will wonder what self-mocking Berlin would have made of this growing monument. He was an erudite wit at the dinner table and, as the reader now sees, in his letters. But he was a thinker first, and for his thought there is no substitute for his essays.
What does "this growing monument" in the last paragraph refer to?
选项
A、Published letters of Berlin.
B、Berlin’s philosophical thought.
C、Published essays of Berlin.
D、Berlin’s charm.
答案
A
解析
语义题。第二段表明,五年前出版了伯林信件的第一卷,近期又出版了厚厚的第二卷,最后一段表示更多的信件还将继续出版,因而出版的伯林信件将越来越多,所以作者将其比喻为越筑越高的纪念碑,因此选[A]。[B]、[C]和[D]均不符合此处文意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/tKMYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
StudentsinAustraliabetweentheagesof6and15canenjoy______education.
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
ThemoststrikingphoneticdifferencebetweenAmericanandBritishEnglishisthepronunciationof______inwords.
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
TheHundredYear’sWaristheintermittentconflictsbetween________thatlastedfrom1337to1453.
随机试题
下列关于城镇土地使用税的说法中,正确的是()。
1979年颁布的第二部《选举法》规定直接选举的投票方法是__________。
男性,45岁。酗酒后8小时出现中上腹疼痛,放射至两侧腰部,伴恶心、呕吐。查体:腹部有压痛、肌紧张及两侧腰腹部出现蓝棕色斑,血压75/55mmHg,脉搏110次/分。最可能的诊断是
以下哪项不属于NCCN-IPI
既治食积腹痛,又治疝气痛的药物是
患者,女,30岁。常年发际处长疖子,此起彼伏。同时有口渴,溲赤,便秘的症状。该患者应辨证为
争议处理是指保险合同发生纠纷后的解决方式,主要有()。
在个人商用房贷款业务的风险管理中,银行的下列做法恰当的有()。
据某省卫生防疫部门统计,被狗咬伤后到医疗机构接种狂犬疫苗的人中,仅有1%感染上了狂犬病。但也有些人被狗咬伤后仅是在家自行处理。该省卫生防疫部门据此推测,被狗咬伤的人群中,感染狂犬病的人所占比例高于1%。以下最有力支持这一推测的是()
μC/OS–Ⅱ系统内核提供的基本功能有:【69】、任务间通信与同步、任务调度、时间管理和【70】等。
最新回复
(
0
)