首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
34
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What can we learn about Recruitment Process Outsourcing in the first paragraph?
选项
A、All companies tend to outsource their not so important services.
B、It gained wide acceptance among the employers as soon as it came out.
C、Recruiting is an important department of many organisations.
D、It took a long time before RPO finally became popular.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段提到“Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while.”即:招聘流程外包在近几年赢得了很好的发展势头,但是这个过程也花费了一段时间。所以,D项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/rTFsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdoesthespeaker’scompanydo?
Whatdoesthespeaker’scompanydo?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatisthecompany’spriority?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatisthecompany’spriority?
WhatwilltakeplaceonFriday?
Task8EducationalSponsorshipThecompanyyouworkforisconsideringfundingaregionaleducationalprojectfor16-18-year-old
Task8EducationalSponsorshipThecompanyyouworkforisconsideringfundingaregionaleducationalprojectfor16-18-year-old
Isadvertisingimportantornot?Whatfactorsmustonetakeintoaccountwhendevelopingadvertisingstrategy?
CouldyoutellmewhatinfluenceyouthinkinternationalbusinessishavingonworkpracticesinChina?Why?
TaskTwo:AgainstA.peoplewouldhavetoworkonSundayB.therecouldbeachangeinthetraditionalpatternoftheweekendC.
随机试题
开口于上鼻道的鼻旁窦是()
MLC调强适形放射治疗确定的射野参数不包括
A.甲胎蛋白(AFP)阳性B.癌胚抗原(CEA)阳性C.尿中本.周(Bence-Jones)蛋白定性试验阳性D.降钙素升高E.尿中17-羟类固醇明显升高多发性骨髓瘤可出现
消渴的治疗原则为虚劳的治疗原则为
急性白血病完全缓解的标准,下列哪项是错误的
如何用A类评定方法评定输入量的标准不确定度?
依据上市公司股息红利差别化个人所得税政策,持股期限超过1年的,暂减按()计入应纳税所得额。
你和小李同时入职,你晋升很快,小李有意见,你会怎么做?
监察部行使的监督是()。
窗口事件是指操作窗口时所引发的事件,下列不属于窗口事件的是______.
最新回复
(
0
)