首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
15
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______. ( )
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/qc4GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
(面对艰巨的任务),wehadbetteractonthesuggestionsmadeatthemeeting.
TheideaofaspecialdaytohonormotherswasfirstputforwardinAmericain1907.Twoyearslaterawoman,Mrs.JohnBruceDo
Don’tworry,Ihavealready______them______thedecision.
Parentsshouldn’t______(favorable)oneoftheirchildrenmorethantheothers.
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUE,accordingtotheauthor?Consideredjudgmentisdifferentfrompersonalpreferencei
Accordingtotheauthor,reallygoodscience______.Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsscience?
Personalinterviewingisusuallyusedwhentheinformationneededistoocomplextobegatheredbyanothertechnique,
Dressingfashionablywasveryimportantinfourteenth-centurySpain.Thiswasespeciallytrueforanymanwhoconsideredhimself
Americansenjoyfastfoodmainlybecause______.Theexpression"pitchinwith"inParagraph2probablymeans______.
随机试题
患者吐血鲜红,发热烦躁,神识不清,渴不多饮,夜寐不宁,舌红绛,脉细数。治疗应首选
经典途径激活补体的抗原抗体复合物
土的无侧限抗压强度试验,要求在规定的试验速度下()内完成试验。
某房地产公司2005年的年终财务报表分析显示本年盈利3176.39万元,于是公司在2006年年初向银行存人了大量资金,作为储备资金,经研究调查发现公司的中介服务机构体系不完善,公司决定利用储备资金来完善公司的各个部门及中间机构。决策部门为了准确衡量公司投
在建设工程管理中,()自始至终是建设工程管理的主导者和责任人。
()是阶段性评价、考试和高考命题的重要依据。
(湖北政法2010A—11)晚饭后,妈妈、姐姐和弟弟要外出到江边散步,妈妈先行,每分钟走60米,走100米后,姐姐带弟弟去追妈妈。姐姐每分钟走80米,弟弟每分钟跑160米,弟弟追上妈妈后又去找姐姐,碰上姐姐后又转去追妈妈,这样跑来跑去,直到姐姐与妈妈相遇才
在考生文件夹下,打开文档Word.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(Word.docx)保存文档。【文档开始】
TheGreatNewspaperWarUpuntilabout100yearsago,newspapersintheUnitedStatesappealedonlytothemostseriousreaders.
Scientistshavebeentakingacloserlookatthelightinginourhomes,officesandvehicles,andthey’reseeingapossibleway
最新回复
(
0
)