首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2013-01-24
31
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its~ incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values."
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish: labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force..Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity--Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun--share one quality that the PM should envy m6re than any other at present: they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay, more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
This passage is most probably part of______.
选项
A、an ethnic study
B、a newspaper article
C、a government report
D、a research report
答案
B
解析
本文为报刊文章。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/qVUYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HumanitiesDisciplinesInmanypeople’seyes,thehumanitiesdisciplinesseemtobedyingout.However,actually,studentsconti
SurveyresultsindicatethatsmokingandalcoholandmarijuanauseincreasedamongresidentsofManhattanduringthe5-8weeksa
Accordingtolegend,Aesculapiusboretwodaughters,PanaceaandHyegeia,whogaverisetodynastiesofhealersandhygienists.
A、stayawayfrompossibledangerB、showFrance’spowerC、cuttheconnectionbetweenthetwocountriesD、arrestsomeofthetopR
ChineseAmericansChineseAmericansareanethnicminorityintheUS.Theyusedtobediscriminated.1.ThehistoryofChinese
A、hiswifelikeshimtoworkforafirmB、heprefersworkingforthegovernmentC、self-employedworkisverydemandingD、self-em
Whyshouldanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
Thedeclineofcivilityandgoodmannersmaybeworryingpeoplemorethancrime,accordingtoGentilityRecalled,editedbyDigb
______wasthemostpopularAmericanpoetof20thcentury.Attheageof87,hewasinvitedtoreadapoemattheinaugurationo
现代社会无论价值观的持有还是生活方式的选择都充满了矛盾。而最让现代人感到尴尬的是,面对重重矛盾,许多时候你别无选择。匆忙与休闲是截然不同的两种生活方式。但在现实生适中,人们却在这两种生活方式间频繁穿梭,有时也说不清自己到底是“休闲着”还是“忙碌着”。譬如说
随机试题
如图所示,X、Y、Z分别是面积为64、180、160的三张不同形状的纸片。它们部分重叠放在一起盖在桌面上,总共盖住的面积为290。且X与Y、Y与Z、Z与X重叠部分面积分别为24、70、36。问阴影部分的面积是多少?
根据发病机制,呼吸困难分类正确的是
A、活血化瘀,化痰通络B、益气养血,通脉止痛C、活血化瘀,行气止痛D、益气养阴,活血通络E、益气活血,通络止痛通心络胶囊的功能是
下列()情况属于检测责任事故。
关于工程合理使用年限的说法,正确的是()。
()是指利用失信惩戒、约束,到守信激励、引导一系列机制,强化对基金市场主体及其行为的诚信约束的管理方式。
资产负债表中的“待摊费用”项目的金额应包括()。
从所给四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定规律性。
论述艺术是审美的意识形态。
已知A,B为三阶方阵,且满足2A-1B=B一4E,其中E是三阶单位矩阵。若B=,求矩阵A。
最新回复
(
0
)