首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
33
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
Why do some people scan friends’ books and records on the shelf?
选项
A、Because books reflect one’s nature.
B、Because it is polite to do so.
C、Because they want to supply each other’s needs.
D、Because books of others are better.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/nNQFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Oneofthemostinterestingparadoxes(矛盾)inAmericatodayisthatHarvardUniversity,theoldestinstitutionofhigherlearning
AnintegralpartofthestoryofAmerica,thecowboyisanationalsymbol.America’sfirstcowboyscamefromMexico.Beginni
Universitiesarenolonger【B1】______emptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmovein,eventothemostunlikel
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixedabilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeand【B1】______
Untiljustafewyearsago,makingababyboyorababygirlwasprettymuchahit-or-miss(偶然的,碰运气的)affair.Notanymore.Paren
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
A、Sheagreeswiththeman.B、MostpeopleholdthesameopinionwithJack.C、Thisyear’sfootballseasonwillbelessexciting.D
Forsometimepastithasbeenwidelyacceptedthatbabies--andothercreatures--learntodothingsbecausecertainactsleadto
随机试题
介导人类I型变态反应的免疫球蛋白是
有关肩关节的描述,错误的是
案例 C煤矿为井工矿,为省属国有煤矿,设计生产能力为450×104t/a,服务年限为65年,其基建施工年限为5年。该煤矿通过了安全设施设计审查,并在2015年完成一期工程建设,于2018年投产,在建设过程中,该矿严格按照“三同时”有关规定进行了施工。矿井
信息分类表的内容包括()。
某一建筑工地,在施工过程中发生了质量事故后,事故单位因抢救人员需要移动现场物件时,下面做法正确的是()。
乐发超市某业务员在打印促销价签时,不小心将某促销产品的价格19.9打印成9.9,直到晚上查账时才发现,给超市当日的盈利带来一定影响,这种风险是()。
用1,2,3,4这四个数组成两个两位数,这两个两位数相乘乘积最小的是()。
企业岗位薪酬体系以()为基础。
(2013年下半年上午试题32)SEI能力成熟度模型(SEICMM)把软件开发企业分为5个成熟度级别,其中_______重点关注产品和过程质量。
A、一个月后B、半小时后C、两个小时后D、三个小时后C根据最后一句话“两个小时过去了,他才走出那个书店”,可知选C。
最新回复
(
0
)