首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, th
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, th
admin
2013-08-03
48
问题
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, the debate has centered on whether they are "damaging" or merely "harmless fun". But McGonigal is a games advocate. Her belief is that games are actually good for us.
In order to solve the world’s most urgent problems, McGonigal says, we need to play more games because gaming creates people who are solution-focused, collaborative, optimistic and hard-working. This position is interesting, although open to the obvious critique that, unlike in-game challenges, real-world problems are not set up to be rewarding, interesting or even soluble, so framing them as a game is likely to lead nowhere. But there’s certainly potential in using game-like mechanics to encourage us to do things we otherwise might not want to: such as the S2H fitness monitor, which allows users to claim rewards for physical activity.
The wider point—whether playing games actually improves any of our skills—is still open for debate and research. Various studies have shown that playing certain games can increase players’ visual attention, fine motor skills and spatial reasoning. Intuitively, it is not surprising that practicing skills involving fast responses and complicated physical maneuvers might make us better at them.
But is this a reason to play games, or a useful position for gaming advocates? As a novelist, I’ve always found the idea of promoting reading because it improves cognitive skills deeply depressing. Reading is a wonderful thing not because it makes our brains better but because it is enjoyable, enriching and gives us new experiences: just like games.
Once someone has told you that something is good for you, it immediately becomes less attractive. I’m not sure it’s necessary to say that playing games will save the world or improve us. Can’t we just have fun?
What should be the purpose of promoting reading according to the author?
选项
A、To broaden readers’ eyesight.
B、To make readers more intelligent.
C、To improve readers’ visual attention.
D、To please readers.
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。定位到第4段,作者认为为了提高认知能力而去阅读是让人沮丧的,阅读是件很快乐的事情,提倡阅读不是因为它使读者变得聪明而是能让读者感到愉悦,给读者新的体验;因此选项D(阅读在于能让人快乐)符合题意。而A(阅读能拓宽人的视野)、B(使人变得智慧)、C(提升人的视觉)都不是作者提倡阅读的原因,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/mbJMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whatyoudecidenowcouldhaveaconsiderable______onyourfuture.
Lastweekthepresidentofthecompanyheldaparty,butpeoplethoughtitagreatpity______themosthumorous,intelligentan
Acommonassumptionabouttheprivatesectorofeducationisthatitcatersonlytotheelite.【C1】______recentresearchpoints
Expectednoisesareusuallymore______thanunexpectedonesofthelikemagnitude.
TheBuckinghamPalaceistheplace______almostalltouristscannotaffordtomisswheninLondon.
InformationtechnologyisexpectedtohaveimpactonallthefollowingEXCEPTWhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECTac
Whatcanwelearnabouttheimpactor?
Ifwestartrightnow,wemightjust______catchtheplanetoLondon.
Whowastheinventorofchewinggum?
It______everydaysofarthismonth.
随机试题
Nottoomanydecadesagoitseemed"obvious"bothtothegeneralpublicandtosociologiststhatmodernsocietyhaschangedpeo
不属于康复的基本内涵的是
下列说法错误的是
A、3分钟B、15分钟C、20分钟D、30分钟E、60分钟结肠定位肠溶片的崩解时限(pH7.8~8.0的磷酸盐缓冲液)是
甲因邻里纠纷失手致乙死亡,甲被批准逮捕。案件起诉后,双方拟通过协商达成和解。对于此案的和解,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2014年试卷二第40题)
陈某在某建筑公司一直做质检工作,后来公司认为陈某表现不错,就将其调离劳动合同约定的质检岗位,提拔为管理人员,但没有就劳动合同的变更签订书面合同。后该公司与陈某解除劳动合同,陈某根据原劳动合同向企业主张补发其质检岗位津贴。依据《劳动合同法》,下列选项正确的有
资质许可机关的上级机关,根据利害关系人的请求或者依据职权,可以撤销建筑业企业资质的情形是()。
周一的升旗仪式上,同学们可以看到匀速上升的旗子,能反映其高度与时间关系的图象大致是()
山雄伟,海辽阔,经奇幻,中国自古便有奇书《山海经》。作为先秦重要古籍,也是一部_______的奇书,《山海经》在现代学者的眼中_______,“成书并非一时,作者亦非一人”,是悠悠千载的历史造就了令人_______的想象力。而现在,书中那些_______的
Justasthesoilisapartoftheearth,______theatmosphere.
最新回复
(
0
)