首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Since World War II the French have been variously surprised, dismayed, irritated and outraged by the power of American culture a
Since World War II the French have been variously surprised, dismayed, irritated and outraged by the power of American culture a
admin
2021-02-21
47
问题
Since World War II the French have been variously surprised, dismayed, irritated and outraged by the power of American culture and its effect on France and the world. Their only consolation has been the conviction that French culture is superior to anything that Walt Disney or Hollywood can offer. What France’s cultural elites have rarely done, however, is examine how both serious and pop culture actually work in the United States. Rather, in the view of Frederic Martel, a Frenchman and author of a recently released book on the topic, they have preferred to hide behind "a certain ideological anti-Americanism."
Now Mr. Martel, 39, a former French cultural attache in Boston, has set out to change this. In Culture in America, a 622-page book weighty with information, he challenges the conventional view here that (French) culture financed and organized by the government is entirely good and that (American) culture shaped by market forces is necessarily bad. This book deals only with creativity and arts financing in the United States. But perhaps surprisingly, given the mixture of fear and contempt that American culture stirs among many French intellectuals, his approach is not disputative. He neither defends nor attacks the United States; he simply describes the American way of culture.
The news media’s response to Culture in America suggests there is room for debate. One weekly, L’Express, said the book offered food for thought. Another, Le Nouvel Observateur, compared it favorably to Bernard-Henri Levy’s recent summarisation, "American Vertigo: Traveling America in the Footsteps of Tocqueville," noting that Mr. Martel provides facts rather than impressions.
The first half of Culture in America—the title echoes Tocqueville’s own "Democracy in America"— is built around a question that puzzles some French: Why doesn’t the United States have a Culture Ministry? One traditional answer is that culture ministries threaten artistic freedom. Yet Mr. Martel demonstrates that Washington does in fact have a record of cultural activism: through the Works Progress Administration, with its theater, writers and art projects, under President Franklin D. Roosevelt; through the Kennedy White House’s embrace of artists; and in the creation of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) in 1965.
Mr. Martel then tracks the so-called culture wars, beginning with the cancellation of a Robert Map-plethorpe photography exhibition at the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington in 1989 over concerns about its explicit content, which led to Congressional campaigning against the National Endowment for the Arts. Even today the endowment’s budget is far below mid-1980s levels and, at just under $125 million for 2006, is roughly what the French government gave the Paris National Opera this year.
Still, what really intrigues Mr. Martel is how American culture flourishes despite the indifference or hostility of major government institutions. And that leads him to the crucial role played by non-profit foundations, corporate sponsors, universities and community organizations, which in practice do receive indirect government support in the form of tax incentives. "If the Culture Ministry is nowhere to be found," he writes, "cultural life is everywhere."
[A] suggests that cultural life is everywhere if there is no Culture Ministry.
[B] wrote the book in an argumentative way.
[C] only concerns the question why America has no Culture Ministry.
[D] has a much smaller budget than it got during mid-1980s.
[E] talks only about creativity and arts financing in America.
[F] said the book embraced some thought-provoking issues.
[G] noted that Martel adhered to facts rather than impressions.
NEA
选项
答案
D
解析
注意NEA是National Endowment for the Arts的缩写,而National Endowment for the Arts在第四、第五段均有出现,解题句在第五段最后一句。原文提到即使到今天,拨给基金会的预算仍远低于80年代中期的水平。该句的endowment指前一句提到的National Endowment for the Arts,即NEA。D项与原文意思相符,其中much smaller对应原文的far below,故D为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/l6pRFFFM
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
ThewriterwarnsAmericansthat______.Whatistheconclusionofthispassage?
ThewriterwarnsAmericansthat______.Thewritergivestheexampleofbreadtoshowthat______.
YouhavejustcomebackfromtheU.S.asamemberofaSino-Americanculturalexchangeprogram.WritealettertoyourAmerican
ManyAmericansregardthejurysystemasaconcreteexpressionofcrucialdemocraticvalues,includingtheprinciplesthatallc
Asia’srealboat-rockerisagrowingChina,notJapan,aseniorAmericaneconomistobserved.Thereissomuchnoisesurround
Asia’srealboat-rockerisagrowingChina,notJapan,aseniorAmericaneconomistobserved.Thereissomuchnoisesurround
Asia’srealboat-rockerisagrowingChina,notJapan,aseniorAmericaneconomistobserved.Thereissomuchnoisesurround
Workingatnonstandardtimes—evenings,nights,orweekends—istakingitstollonAmericanfamilies.One-fifthofallemployedAm
随机试题
某溶液主要含有Ca2+、Mg2+及少量Fe3+、Al3+,今在PH=10时加入三乙醇胺,以EDTA滴定,用铬黑T为指示剂,则测出的是()。
治疗高血压病肝风上扰证,应首选()
甲(男)和乙(女)均为某公司职员,一日,甲告诉乙他新买了一张影碟,邀乙前去观看。乙一向爱看电影,于是欣然前往。谁知到了甲家里后,甲即开始动手动脚,并欲强奸乙,恰在此时,甲妻回家,甲只得作罢,但小声威胁乙说:“明天下午你再过来,否则我告诉你丈夫,你和我通奸。
水上施工作业人员必须(),严禁酒后上岗作业,严禁船员在船期间饮酒。
Excel表格处理操作:考试要求:(1)将标题字体设为“宋体”18磅,斜体,置于表格正上方居中。(2)计算每名学生的总分和各门课的平均分。(3)将低于60分的单科成绩用红色显示。
根据以下资料,回答问题。2008一2015年慈溪市,常熟市,昆山市,张家港市的上半年规模以上工业利润总额变化情况。以下说法中,错误的是:
东大公司本年实现税后净利润5100万元,按照10%的比例提取法定盈余公积金,按照5%的比例提取任意盈余公积金,年初未分配利润为借方余额100万元,公司发行在外的普通股为1000万股(每股面值2元),利润分配之前的股东权益为8000万元,每股现行市价为30元
当代大学生树立自觉维护国家利益意识的基本要求是()
Analystshavetheirgoathumor,andIhavereadsomeofthisinterpretativeliterature,(1)_____withoutbeinggreatlyinstruct
A、Hedrovetowork.B、Hetookataxitowork.C、Hetookabustowork.D、Hegotaliftfromothers.D男士说谢谢女士开车送他去上班,女士说不用谢,并表示在上
最新回复
(
0
)