首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
admin
2015-09-26
31
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman", for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / m
n/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
To what extent does the language reflect and shape attitudes and behaviors?
选项
A、They are closely related.
B、It is a matter of conjecture.
C、They have nothing to do with each other.
D、Only in English are they closely related.
答案
B
解析
细节题。从文章最后一段首句The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes andbehaviors is a matter of conjecture.可以看出,语言在某种程度上反映和塑造讲话者的态度和举止只是一种推测,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/kpKMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
Surprisingly,nooneknowshowmanychildrenreceiveeducation,inEnglishhospitals,stilllessthecontentorqualityofthat
随机试题
早期诊断肺结核的主要方法是
以下关于表格的描述中错误的是
狭义的建筑物是指()。
锅炉压力容器结构不合理,造成局部应力过高,经过反复加压卸压而产生的裂纹是()。
某水电建筑公司承建坝后厂房工程建筑面积18000m2,根据类似工程成本估算该工程固定总成本516.67万元,单位变动成本722.26元/m2,单位报价1083.33元/m2(销售税金及附加不计)。问题:用公式法计算该工程项目的保本规模及相应报
对于下列陈述,符合营业税规定的是( )。
我国的文化遗产,绝大部分是用文言记录下来的,文言文中,有许多优点值得保留、享用。可是想要继承、享用,先要学会它。不管《资治通鉴》《全唐诗》价值多高,你不会文言,就只好望书兴叹。可是,学的人和会的人越来越少,已经有不少人设想,应该培养少数专业人员,由他们负责
“建国君民,教学为先”“化民成俗,其必由学”揭示了()。
()具有加速个体发展的特殊功能。
A、Theyhavedifficultyidentifyingthesecells.B、Theyaren’tsurehowthesecellswork.C、They’velearnedhowtoreproducethes
最新回复
(
0
)