首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
31
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/klCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
DuringJapan’srevolutioninthe19thcentury,theJapanesedenouncedtheirowntraditionalcultureand________thewesternideal
下面你将听到一段关于中国法制建设的讲话。当今是法行天下的时代。国运之兴盛,政治之昌明,社会之稳定,经济之发展,民族之团结,文化之繁荣,人民之安居乐业,都离不开法律之维系和法律之保障。中国也不例外。一个国家采取什么样的治国方略,关系着国家的前途和命
上个世纪70年代末,我参加了第四次全国文代会,大会上小平同志致辞时获得的长时间的热烈掌声给我留下了极深的印象。这次大会是文艺界经历十年浩劫后的第一次盛会,也是小平同志复出后第一次代表党中央、国务院同广大文艺工作者见面。1960年的第三次文代会后,
北京奥运会不仅将展示新的激动人心的中国文化,也将体现北京独特的个性与技巧。北京也认为,应从奥林匹克运动中通过广泛咨询,得到技术上的建议。在准备这份报告时,我们咨询了来自悉尼、亚特兰大、巴塞罗那的专家。协商和对话是我们工作的原则。//再次申办以来,
我想从科学技术的角度讲一讲我自己对全球化的观察和认识,请各位指正。我看到的是,全世界大多数科技工作者,包括很多中国科学家、工程师们在内,都张开双手,欢迎甚至期待着全球化的到来。这一现象很值得重视。//科学技术是人类现代文明的中心,是任何国家、民族
本次会议是信息社会世界峰会的首次政府间筹备会议,既要处理程序性问题,又要处理实质性问题。开好筹备会,是峰会取得成功的重要保证。中国代表团愿就峰会筹备工作谈以下几点看法://一、要高度重视知识和人才问题。在未来信息社会中,知识和技能是促进经济发展的
下面你将听到的是一段有关中国教育改革与发展的讲话。党的十一届三中全会以来,随着党和国家工作重点转移到以经济建设为中心。教育在社会主义现代化建设中的地位和作用也越来越重要,我国教育的改革和发展取得了很大的成就。进入20世纪90年代,科学
调查者发现每天散步有利于睡眠质量。他们同时也提出只有早上锻炼才对晚上睡觉有利。那些晚上锻炼的人实际上有更多的睡眠问题。一个可能的解释是晚上和早上锻炼相比会影响睡眠质量。早上锻炼可能会让生命钟变得有序,而晚上锻炼则会打乱这种秩序。但是还需要更多的调查来证实这
根据“十五”期间的形势和任务,《纲要》提出今后五年经济和社会发展的主要目标是:国民经济保持较快发展速度,经济结构战略性调整取得明显成效,经济增长质量和效益显著提高,为到2010年国内生产总值比2000年翻一番奠定坚实基础。国有企业建立现代企业制度取得重大进
随机试题
下列各句中“颜色”的意义与其他三句不同的是()
患儿,男,10岁。左上1及右上1嵌入性脱位。正确的处理方式是
链斗式挖泥船适于施工的自然环境条件为()。
关于玻璃幕墙安装施工安全措施的说法,正确的是()。
Inresponsetoscandalsrockingthestudentloanindustry,theHousehasquicklypassedreformlegislationtorequiremorediscl
阅读以下说明,回答问题1至问题3,将解答填入答题纸的对应栏内。【说明】某企业的IT部门为了细化工作分工,理顺管理流程,安排工程师小张负责本企业的网络硬件及相关设施管理。小张在明确了工作范围后,对工作内容做了初步规划,列出了以下三项主要工作。
如果在窗体上添加一个通用对话框控件DBT,那么语句“DBT.Action=4”的作用是
某系统结构图如图所示。该系统结构图的深度是()
Theoldideathatchildprodigies(神童)"burnthemselves"or"overtaxtheirbrains"intheearlyyears,therefore,arepreytofai
WhatisMr.Bacon’sjobspecifically?
最新回复
(
0
)