首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
41
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
What the passage tries to tell the reader is that______.
选项
A、food industry misled people about salt consumption
B、strict salt consumption is necessary for people’s health
C、salt consumption has no direct effect upon people’s health
D、the suggestion of strict salt consumption might be misleading
答案
D
解析
整篇文章的大意是,盐对人的健康的影响其实并未得到证实,因此,严格控制盐的摄入量可能误导了人们对盐的负面作用的认识。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jPG9FFFM
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
Thesenserelationofthefollowingpairofsentences(seeXandY)is______.X.MaryhasbeentoJapan.Y.MaryhasbeentoAsia
Whatistheappropriateresponseto"It’sbeensuchawonderfullecture,.Thankyouverymuch"?
WhichofthefollowingisNOTasuitablepre-listeningactivity?
Ateacherhandedoutalistoftwenty"if"sentencesandaskedstudentstodiscussandfindoutthegrammaticalrules.What’sth
Plantsandanimalsthathavebeenstudiedcarefullyseemtohavebuilt-inclocks.Thesebiologicalclocks,astheyarecalled,u
A:It’sslippy.B:Blessyou.A:Thankyou.Thisexampleexplainsthatlanguagehas______function.
DeathValleyisoneofthemostfamousdesertsintheUnitedStates,coveringawideareawithitsalkalisand.Almost20percen
DeathValleyisoneofthemostfamousdesertsintheUnitedStates,coveringawideareawithitsalkalisand.Almost20percen
WhathappenedtoMr.Zhu?Hespokein______voiceintoday’sclassthatIcouldhearalmostnothing.
下面片段选自某高中英语课堂教学实录。Step11.T:WhowroteHamletandKingLear?SS:WilliamShakespeare.T:Letslearnaboutthelif
随机试题
根据我国《产品质量法》的规定,不属于生产者承担产品责任构成要件的是【】
设z=x2y+x-3,则等于().
建设项目总承包(D+B)模式具有的优点主要有( )。
关于小型空心砌块砌筑工艺的说法,正确的是()。
负债的特征是()。
焦虑性神经官能症以广泛性焦虑症(慢性焦虑症)和发作性惊恐状态(急性焦虑症)为主要临床表现,是一种无根据的惊慌和紧张或其紧张惊恐程度与现实情况很不相称,心理上体验为泛化的、无固定目标的担心惊恐,生理上伴有警觉增高的躯体症状。根据上述定义,下列属于焦虑性神经官
给定资料1.十八届三中全会《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》所提出的“提高文化开放水平”引起社会关注。中国对外文化集团公司董事长兼总经理张宇表示,“提高文化开放水平”是深化改革的必然选择。“我国30多年来经济社会发展的成功
从18世纪开始,______。如今,英、美、法;德和意大利等国的博物馆收藏了几十万件埃及文物,仅法国卢浮宫就有4.5万件,而意大利都灵博物馆的埃及文物典藏也仅次于埃及开罗博物馆的10万件。具有讽刺意味的还有,狮身人面像上的石刻胡须部分被收藏在大英博物馆中,
Almosteverynewinnovationgoesthroughthreephases.When【C1】______introducedintothemarket,theprocessof【C2】______isslo
It’sclearthatsocialmedialikeTwitterandFacebookarechangingthewaywelive.Indeed,wemightfeelasifwearesudd
最新回复
(
0
)