首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Theories of History I. How much we know about history? A. Written records exist for only a fraction of man’s time B. The accurac
Theories of History I. How much we know about history? A. Written records exist for only a fraction of man’s time B. The accurac
admin
2013-08-05
45
问题
Theories of History
I. How much we know about history?
A. Written records exist for only a fraction of man’s time
B. The accuracy of these records is often (1)_____, (1)______
and details in them often needs improvement.
II. Reconstruction of history before writing
A. being difficult because of the (2)_____ of history to us (2)______
B. the most that we can do is: use (3)_____ (3)______
and the knowledge of the habits of animals.
III. Theories about history
A. Objective: to (4)_____ the beginning and (4)______
deduce the end of man’s story.
B. One theory believes that man continually (5)_____. (5)______
—(6)_____ must be more intelligent and civilized (6)______
than his ancestors.
—Human race will evolve into a race of (7)_____. (7)______
C. The second theory holds the man’s history is like a (8)_____ (8)______
of development.
—Modern man is not the most superior.
—Modern man may be inferior to members of (9)_____. (9)______
D. The third theory: Human societies repeat a cycle of stages,
but overall progress is (10)_____ in the long historical perspective. (10)______
(8)
Theories of History
Good morning, class. Today’s lecture is mainly concerned with some theories of history.
How much of man’s history do we know? We really know very little. Written records exist for only a fraction of what we suppose to have been man’s time as a unique species. Furthermore, the accuracy of these records is often suspected, and the scope and selection of significant detail in them often needs improvement.
It is worse when we try to reconstruct man’s history before the development of writing, and this is unfortunate because the history of the greatest discoveries, such as fire, the wheel and the sail, as well as the history of the early development of human society are lost to us.. The most that we can do is to use traces, deduction, speculation and the knowledge we have of the habits of those animals which have elementary social order to help us make a partial reconstruction. This is hardly a satisfactory substitute for precise information.
With our knowledge of human history, which is only fragmentary at best, it is therefore nearly impossible to reconstruct the beginning and to deduce the end of the story of man. Thus, there have developed many schools of thought on the subject, each of which attempts to give coherence to the human past by fitting it into the framework of a theory of history.
Now, 1et’s take a look at one of these theories, it is assumed that man continually progress. He has evolved from a lower to a higher form of being, and he continues to evolve. This evolution takes place both in terms of his potentials and his abilities to actualize these potentials. If one holds this theory, one feels that modern man must be more intelligent and civilized today than his ancestors, as well as physically and morally superior to them. One further assumes that this progress will continue into an ever more glorious future. Here deduction often ends and dreams of Utopia begin, for it seems that most of us find it hard to think of the human race developing into a race of angels. All in all, as theory of history, the above view has had many eminent supporters.
It might be well to mention here a variation on this theory that used to be popular, namely the idea that man rose from a low condition to a Golden Age at some time in the remote past, and that things have gone straight downhill ever since. Many eminent men have found a sort of gloomy comfort in this idea, but science has now opened up possibilities for the future which make this theory less defendable. Perhaps for this reason the theory has little modern support.
A second theory of history is held by those men who see man’s history as something quite different from a simple progression from a lower to a higher state. They see it as a cycle of stages of development, which are predictable in their broad outlines and main features. As surely as a civilization rises and comes into being, so also must it decline and fall. The chief pattern one sees in history is the rise and fall of civilization. Man, according to this theory, is warlike in one stage of his history and humane in another. This is not due to individual human beings or to general progress, but rather to determining socioeconomic patterns that are not, as yet, understood. To holders of this theory, modern man is not looked upon as the most superior social being yet produced. He is simply the typical product of the current stage in the cycle of our civilization. In fact, he may actually be inferior to members of past civilizations. It all depends upon what stage of civilization we happen to be living in. Indeed, it has been said that the average modern literate city dweller is comparatively more ignorant of his era’s fund of knowledge than other literate city dwellers of the past. While the staggering fund of knowledge in our technologically advanced world is undoubtedly greater than that of any past civilization, it is probably true that the average modern man, relying on such repetitive forms of entertainment as television and working in a narrowly specialized job, knows a great deal less sheer information about his world than did earlier people.
In a third theory of history, the two above theories are to some degree reconciled. According to this theory, which is often termed the spiral view of history, human societies do repeat a cycle of stages, but overall progress is observable in the long historical perspective. Civilizations do rise and fall, as the advocates of the second theory maintain, but the new civilization which replaces the first, usually by conquest, contains superior qualities which enable it to rise to a higher stage of development until it declines and is replaced by yet a third civilization.
The above theories interpret history in term of the overall progress of mankind in general without respect to differentiation within the social order. It is also possible to view human history in terms of the interaction of socioeconomic groups. Human history, according to this theory, is most clearly interpreted as the disappearance of class struggle. Most people who hold this theory assume a resolution of the struggle through the disappearance of class differences, although it would be just as correct to assume that the struggle could continue unresolved. Those who assume that the struggle can eventually be resolved hold that history has a goal and that progress can be measured in terms of how quickly mankind is reaching that goal.
选项
答案
cycle of stages
解析
此题讲述的是第二种历史理论,认为人类历史是循环的发展.即a cycle of stages of development,由此可知答案为cycle of stages。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jFRYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECTabouttheaccident?
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECTabouttheaccident?
泊珍到偏远小镇的育幼院把生在那里养到一岁的孩子接回来。但泊珍看他第一眼,仿似一声雷劈头而来,令她晕头胀脑,这1岁的孩子脸型长得如此熟悉,她心里的第一道声音是,不能带回去痛苦纠聚心中,眉心发烫发热,胸口郁闷难展,胃里一股气冲喉而上。院长说这孩子发
Whichofthefollowingisanexampleofclipping
StagesofSecondLanguageAcquisitionStageI:(1)______Period:(1)______1)inthisstage,moststudentsunderstand(2)______th
TheOldManandtheSeaiswrittenby______.
______authoredTheWrathofGrapes.
Culturereferstothesocialheritageofapeople—thelearnedpatternsforthinking,feelingandactingthatcharacterizea
“人们的生活越来越富裕,但却远不如以前那样快乐了”,这个现象似乎早已成为现代生活永恒的矛盾之一。一个可能的答案就潜藏在我们的心理因素中,即如何才能够满足。我们对于地位、财富的需求从来都不是孤立定位的,而是在参照组——通常是那我们自认为与其地位相当的人——比
随机试题
A.胃黏膜腺体萎缩B.胃黏膜肠上皮化生C.胃黏膜溃疡形成D.胃黏膜上皮异型性增生进展期胃癌可以表现为
先兆流产与难免流产最主要的区别是
罗马国家第一部成文法是:
下列科目中,属于预算会计科目的是()。
当事人对合同变更的内容约定不明确的,推定为未变更。()
读下图,图中O点为地球表面昼半球的中心点,a为经线,b为纬线。据此回答问题。b纬线的纬度可能是()。
历史课程资源的核心是()。
无论给文字配图还是给图配上文字,都有助于学习者回忆相关内容,从信息加工角度来看,这是因为()。
一个try代码段后面必须跟若干个catch代码段或者一个【】代码段。
Lookatthestatementsbelowandatthedefinitionsoffivefrequently-talkedtermsinmostrecentyears,whichhavereflectedt
最新回复
(
0
)