首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
31
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The author was told the idea that books are______.
选项
A、more cherished by previous people
B、mostly stored in public libraries for free reading
C、luxuries for people when he was young
D、valuable for people to collect and treasure
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/iNQFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
AnintegralpartofthestoryofAmerica,thecowboyisanationalsymbol.America’sfirstcowboyscamefromMexico.Beginni
Itwas____________(在危难时刻)thatIfinallyfoundoutwhathewasreallylike.
Itisnotsurprisingthataphilosophyborrowedfrombusinessshouldseeitsprincipalfocuswithineducationasthefurthering
Universitiesarenolonger【B1】______emptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmovein,eventothemostunlikel
A、Thedegreeofviolenceinprogramsistoohigh.B、Thereshouldn’tbeanycommercialsontelevision.C、Watchingtoomuchtelevi
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Recently,thenewshasbeenfilledwithreportsofthe"birdflu."Asiaisonaregion-widehealthalert,withgovernmentsslaug
I’llworkwithredoubledefforts;_______________(我绝不会辜负你们对我的期望的)
Theyhurriedthere,______(发现会议被取消了).
随机试题
A、Hewasworthrespecting.B、Hewasalonelymaninthemountains.C、Hedidn’tdeservesomuchrespect.D、Helikedtobeplayed
有一64岁女性患者,近2年来发现外阴左侧有一肿块,疼痛,2个月前破溃,且有血性分泌物,查体见左侧大阴唇中段有一硬结约3cm×2cm×2cm。基底宽,不活动,腹股沟淋巴结未触及。该病人的初步诊断是
色甘酸钠能起到抗过敏作用的机制是
男性,41岁。2小时前突然出现剧烈头痛,伴呕吐,四肢活动好,体温正常,克氏征阳性男性,43岁。心脏病20年,房颤2年。1天前突发意识丧失,四肢抽搐3分钟左右,10分钟后清醒,左侧上下肢不能活动。神清,血压正常,心房纤颤。右眼无光感,左上下肢肌力0级,左
下列有关流行性乙型脑炎呼吸衰竭的治疗,错误的是
使用IC卡进行项目实名制管理可实现如下管理功能()。
北方某厂房无采暖设施,选用预作用自动喷水灭火系统,安装完毕后对其进行测试,下列选项中,不属于试验内容的是()。
投资者张小姐持有X公司股票500股,预期该公司未来3年股利为零增长,每期股利为15元。预计从第四年开始转为正常增长,增长率为3%。目前无风险收益率为4%,市场平均股票要求收益率为12%,X公司股票的标准差为2.6531,市场组合的标准差为2.2562,两者
某公司新招聘了一名财务主管,他是业界资深人士。当他接手公司财务工作后,发现本部门一名出纳的工作表现与其以往的绩效记录相差很远。他接手以前,这名员工的绩效考评记录均是优秀,但自他来后,发现这名员工在工作中总是出错,而且还经常违反公司的规章制度。财务主管百思不
虚拟人力资源管理是指以合作关系为基础,充分利用现代信息网络技术,帮助企业获取、发展和筹划智力和劳力资本的一种人力资源管理办法,它可以满足企业管理虚拟化发展的要求,将大量的人力资源管理活动外部化或由员工实现自主管理,企业从而可以将主要精力放在核心人力资源管理
最新回复
(
0
)