首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2012-01-19
32
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specially, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______.
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/iAasFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhenhediesinAprilof1983,Dr.JoelHildebrandwas101yearsold,whohadbeenmarriedforseventy-fiveyears,andhadtaugh
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷漠)andstagnation(呆滞).
【61】Itisawell-knownfactthatthereareconstantconflictsamongdifferentgroupsofpeople,andthatpeopletendtoblamet
CopernicuswasborninTorun,Poland,onFebrury19,1473.Littleisknownabouthisearlylifeexceptthathisfatherdiedwhen
CopernicuswasborninTorun,Poland,onFebrury19,1473.Littleisknownabouthisearlylifeexceptthathisfatherdiedwhen
Scientistsbelievethatpeople"dressedup"longbeforetheymadeahabitofwearingclothes.Primitivemandressedhimselfinf
WhatisSaffoaccordingtohimself?
随机试题
习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想是实现中华民族伟大复兴的行动指南。
在我国,狂犬病的主要传染源是
男,3天,臀位产,生后5小时出现呕吐,呈喷射性,伴尖声哭叫、青紫、体温不升。查体:前囟饱满,心肺正常,拥抱反射消失。诊断最大可能是
受精卵着床必须具备的条件,哪项是错误的
A.地高辛B.洋地黄毒苷C.米力农D.多巴胺E.毒毛花苷K通过抑制磷酸二酯酶,加强心肌收缩力的非苷类药物是()。
和解与调解相比较,其主要区别为()。
在幼儿园课程评价中,既是课程评价对象,又是课程评价主体的是()
OurPhonesAren’tJustMessingWithOurPolitics—They’reAlsoSlowingOurEconomyThehand-wringingunderwayabouttherol
Canada’spremiers(theleadersofprovincialgovernments),iftheyhaveanybreathleftaftercomplainingaboutOttawaattheirl
WhatkindofweatherisnormalforMarch?
最新回复
(
0
)