2. 考研
  3. The Nobel Prize is a mysterious incarnation of power and authority, an anointed ritual whose claims are accepted as part of the

The Nobel Prize is a mysterious incarnation of power and authority, an anointed ritual whose claims are accepted as part of the

admin2015-04-10  35
问题     The Nobel Prize is a mysterious incarnation of power and authority, an anointed ritual whose claims are accepted as part of the order of things. The Nobel Prize is at once a relic of the past and a self-admiring mirror of our democratized, scientized, secularized modern culture. After a century of existence, the Nobel has become a problematic part of modern history: it helps shape our perception of ourselves for better or worse.
    Like monarchy, the Nobel Prize surrounds itself with mystery and extraordinary secretiveness. Indeed, the media have more easily breached the privacy of the British royal family than that of the Nobel institution. The prizes present themselves as if handed down from eternity. But as even a cursory inspection will reveal, the juries that pick the laureates have often shown bias, lapses of judgment and bitter infighting. In the sciences, a number of quarrels, scandals, and even lawsuits have erupted over claims to priority or credit for collaborations honored by Nobles. And while widely admired, the science prizes have also been charged with swaying research goals and funding, however inadvertently, and more insidiously with corrupting scientific ambitions by the lure of Nobel fames. Such controversies, together with public dissent from several prizes, have been part of the Nobel history since its beginning. All prizes stir arguments; the Nobel’s fame simply magnifies this hugely.
    The very glory and stature of the Nobel Prizes prompt some sharp questions. Should such high endeavors of the human spirit as science, literature, and peace be treated as competitions, however exalted? Should these priceless efforts be paid the enormous, though "honorary," price lavished on the winners? Would it matter if there never had been a Nobel Price? Or if it vanished tomorrow? The problem is that the prices are not merely awards and medals but are aspects of power woven into our lives: it was once and future Nobelists who built the nuclear bombs that still hang fatefully over us; Nobelists now play an important part in public and military policy.
    It is also true that the Nobel Prizes show modern fame: the Nobel Prize pays honor to some of the highest human adventures in nature and matter, creativity and justice. Where else, moreover, can both the unfamed and the general public find a replacement for the authority and coherence, to whatever degree, the Nobel has come to possess? In a world and age as inwardly fractured as ours this is a question not lightly dismissed.
Which of the following statements is true about the Nobel Prize?
选项 A、Prejudice does not exist among the panel of judges any longer.
B、The prizes need to be diversified.
C、The prize manifests authority and coherence.
D、The prizes are unexpected to the winners.
答案C
解析 下列关于诺贝尔奖的表述中，哪一项正确?[A]诺贝尔奖的评委已经不存在偏见。[B]诺贝尔奖应当多样化。[C]诺贝尔奖显示了权威和一致性。[D]对于获奖者来说，获得诺贝尔奖很意外。[D]“对于获奖者来说，获得诺贝尔奖很意外”，从第二段可以看出，事实不完全是这样的；从第二段第四句中的have often shown bias可知，就算是诺贝尔奖的评委，也依然存有偏见，因此[A]错误；[B]认为该奖项需要多样化，文中未提及。[C]可以从最后一段中的find a replacement…coherence看出，故选[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/hBFRFFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)