首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
37
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/h5jGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Oceanographyhasbeendefinedas"Theapplicationofallsciencestothestudyofthesea".Beforethenineteenthcentury,s
Ineed______cloth,forI’mgoingtomake______clothes.
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Sandycoulddonothingbut______tohisteacherthathewaswrong.
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’saneldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
随机试题
在常见的坡口形式中,________形坡口的填充量最大,也最容易引起焊件变形。
A:Areextremesportspopularinyourcountry?B:They’renotverypopular.【D1】______ThereisaTVprogramonaboutthemeac
就一般侵权行为而言,当事人对造成的损害都没有过错的,根据实际情况,对损害后果承担责任的是()
患儿5岁,8月中旬高热、抽搐2小时来诊,应先查()
地下水位上升将使土中自重应力减小的土层位置是:
固执、猜疑是以下哪种人格障碍的特点?()
陕南民歌多有川楚之风,紫阳民歌和镇巴民歌已经列入中国国家级非物质文化遗产名录。()
()对于教师相当于()对于树木
最理想的评价量表是()
规模庞大的
最新回复
(
0
)