首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of
(1) In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of
admin
2018-06-29
26
问题
(1) In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a "scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
(2) As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends" to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
(3) Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc. , or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
(4) If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to (b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say "science" they mean (a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a "man of science" : no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly.
(5) This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a "scientist" , as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
(6) But is it really true that a "scientist", in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international" , but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
(7) On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
(8) But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
(9) Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this.
Which of the following is INCORRECT as regards scientists?
选项
A、Many people assume that scientists can do well in handling political affairs.
B、German scientists did research on atomic bombs.
C、Generally people don’t regard an economist as a scientist.
D、Scientists prefer laboratory work to administration.
答案
D
解析
细节题。第五段最后指出,那么接下去的推论就是,一个化学家或物理学家,或者其他类似的科学家在政治上要比诗人或律师更有智慧。事实上已经有数以百万计的人对此深信不疑,故[A]符合文意;第六段最后一句指出,始终有许多才俊之士在对合成油料、喷气飞机、火箭和原子弹之类做必要的研究,故[B]符合文意;第二段第二句指出,成人教育往往会“忽视那些有利于文学、经济学和社会学科的研究”,很显然,经济学和社会学没有被看作科学的分支,故[C]符合文意。只有[D]文中没有提及,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/gvvMFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WritinganArgumentativeEssayI.Structureofanargumentativeessay—introduction:1)atopic2)some【T1】______information【T1】__
PassageFourWhatisthemostprominentcharacteristicofWoolf’snovels?
PassageTwo
AnothermilestoneonthejourneytowardsdigitalcashwaspassedonNovember13th.Thatdatemarkedtheemergencefrombeta-test
Besidesconcernsabouthowadsaffectindividuals,criticshaveraisedethicalissuesabouthowadvertisingaffectssociety.F
Amajoraspectofmanyfirms’marketingstrategiesoverthepastdecadehavebeenthedevelopmentofnewproducts.【M1】______Co
Amajoraspectofmanyfirms’marketingstrategiesoverthepastdecadehavebeenthedevelopmentofnewproducts.【M1】______Co
It’stheholidayseasonandthatmeanskidsbythemillionsareaskingSantafortheopportunitytoblowawayenemysoldiersan
It’stheholidayseasonandthatmeanskidsbythemillionsareaskingSantafortheopportunitytoblowawayenemysoldiersan
随机试题
A.苍术B.藿香C.佩兰D.白豆蔻E.草果用于治疗疟疾的药物是
患者男性,58岁。胸闷痛反复发作二年,加重一日,现胸闷如窒而痛,气短,喘憋,心烦易怒,咯黄痰,头昏沉,大便干,夜寐不安,舌暗红苔黄腻,脉滑数弦。
法律责任是一种不利的法律后果,而产生法律责任的原因之一是违法行为,关于违法行为的构成要素,以下论述正确的是:()
根据《大气污染防治行动计划》,到2017年,除必要保留的以外,地级及以上城市建成区基本淘汰每小时()及以下的燃煤锅炉,禁止新建每小时()以下的燃煤锅炉。
只有掌握了业主、设计单位、咨询单位和竞争对手的情况,承包商才能准确地报价,这说明( )也是影响建设工程投资的重要因素。
下列属于泄露客户信息的行为是()。
甲公司是一家国有煤矿企业,按照2013年1月1日开始实施的《中央企业负责人经营业绩考核暂行办法》对企业负责人实际经济增加值考核2016年的企业财务报表中有关资料如下:(1)平均资产合计为20000万元(其中,在建工程为3000万元,有80%符合主业规定)
根据测算,全国城乡普遍实施“单独二胎”政策,将使总人口在2030年达到14.53亿,峰值人口增加1500万;2050年,总人口下降为13.85亿,但比现行生育率增加约5000万人,“单独二胎”与现行生育政策相比,2030年老龄化水平从24.1%降到23.8
A、 B、 C、 D、 B
A、Learninghowtochangemajors.B、Decidingwhichprofessortofollow.C、Learninghowtomanagetime.D、Makingsurehowtolearn
最新回复
(
0
)